Every so often, the government announces measures to encourage an increase in the birth rate. Logically, these measures are likely to fail — no one will have more children for the sake of a subsidy. If a subsidy results in better child care, then that's a good thing. But I can't help but be worried by the thinking behind such a measure. The added expense is not such a problem, and that is why the population issue has been narrowed down to a matter of having more children to balance out the aging population. However, the main problem is that no overall solution has been discussed.
In the final analysis, there is only one real cause of the world's environmental problems: There are too many people. Overpopulation and excessive consumption has led to the destruction of habitats, air and water pollution, extinction of species and an imbalance in many ecological cycles. One example is the hottest topic of debate: global warming, the result of imbalances in carbon dioxide concentrations in the Earth's atmosphere.
Our Earth is protesting because the human population is unsustainable. Our little Taiwan, with its many high mountains and sparse lowlands, is the second most densely populated country in the world. In Kaohsiung, more than 9,800 people are squeezed in to 1km2. Can Taiwan really sustain further population growth?
Today, when heavy rain sets off landslide after landslide and academics estimate that the sea level will continue to rise, eventually submerging Taiwan's western lowlands, including Taipei and Tainan, our government wants to increase the population. What kind of logic is this?
What should be done about the aging population? How about changing the definition of the word "old?" Another factor contributing to overpopulation is increased life expectancy. Medical science has increased our life expectancy and 80 is no longer considered that old. If people continue to retire after working for 25 or 30 years, that means that someone who is 80 years old has to be cared for by others for decades of his or her life. If we try to balance this account by increasing the population, we will only make things worse. Maybe the solution is to find ways for everyone to be able to work into his or her old age, so that they don't have to rely on others.
Rather than increasing birth rates, it would be better if the government directed its efforts toward preparing for the arrival of an aged society and creating a retirement pension system based on equality and fairness. If the government still has any energy left after doing all that, there is nothing wrong with conducting serious research on how to respond to ecological disasters and how to restore damaged land. But having more children will not solve the problem.
When deciding its policy on population, the government needs to give due consideration to the limitations of the treasury, Taiwan and the Earth.
Kuo Yenmin is a research assistant in the life sciences department's Laboratory of Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS