In Tokyo earlier this month, Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer took part in the "two plus two" talks between the foreign and defense ministers of Japan and Australia.
Earlier, Downer said the region should use six-way talks as the foundation for a "Northeast Asian security mechanism" to deal with security issues such as North Korea's nuclear program and the Taiwan Strait.
He said that for Australia, "No region is more important to our future than North Asia." Although Downer did not mention Taiwan, it would be valuable for Taiwan to consider his statements.
First, the Taiwan Strait problem is much more critical than most Taiwanese imagine. Australia has consistently emphasized collective security, and while the Australian Defence Force is not particularly strong, it has always cooperated with the US military in maintaining a certain degree of combat readiness and training.
In international affairs, Australia has toed the US neocon "world police" line and invested considerable resources in preparing for and responding to regional conflicts that the US has entered, as well as potential military threats to the US, especially in the Asia-Pacific region.
The pace of China's military development in recent years has been astonishing, while Taiwan's military has stagnated compared with others in Northeast Asia.
Taiwan is investing little in arms, and the political focal point is domestic change. Consider that there has been an important election every year since 2004 and it is easy to see why cross-strait tensions and the change in China's posture receive less attention.
The focus on domestic politics has also affected policy, leading to the neglect of cross-strait issues. Two examples are the pan-blue camp's continued opposition to the arms procurement bill and the Democratic Progressive Party's plans to open up the country to Chinese tourism.
In this situation, the focal point has moved away from the Chinese military threat to Taiwan, thus marginalizing the issue. When Australia, a third party, makes this assessment, Taiwan must not turn a blind eye.
Second, we should consider the volatility of the region. North Korea's nuclear threat had been the hottest issue in East Asia, but since the agreement on Feb. 13, things have calmed down somewhat. Obviously North Korea does not intend to flatly oppose US and Japanese interests. The US also intends to form a security framework, asking each ally in the region to strengthen defenses to prevent a conflict from breaking out. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), however, firmly resists the benefits of this policy.
Although Downer defended China, he was speaking about China in regard to Japan. In reality, the Australians believe that the Taiwan Strait is a place where violence may erupt. There is little danger over the Diaoyutais or the East China Sea, which concern Japan, because, as Downer said: "With the possible exception of Taiwan, China is not a country that is looking at expanding or acquiring territory."
He added: "China is not about exporting ideology or exporting a political system, with a possible exception of its relationship with Taiwan."
The latent meaning here is that Australia does not believe China is willing to unconditionally support North Korea.
If Taiwan fails to strengthen its military while unconditionally seeking conciliation with China, it will exclude itself from the US' Asia-Pacific strategy; this is what marginalization really means.
A new low point in Taiwan-US relations should not surprise us. Whether Taiwan will receive greater assistance or be marginalized depends on the determination of Taiwanese themselves.
Bill Chang is a doctoral candidate at the University of New South Wales in Sydney.
Translated by Jason Cox
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS