Saturday marked the Taiwan Railway Administration's (TRA) 120th anniversary. Government policy in recent years has emphasized the construction of highways rather than the expansion of the railway system, the number of personal vehicles has increased and air transportation has seen rapid development. This has led to structural changes in the domestic transportation market that have caused operational problems for the TRA.
To deal with the impact of the social, economic, political and technological developments of the 21st century, the TRA must transform its mode of operation by implementing a sweeping restructuring project. Everything from organizational structure to organizational culture needs to be addressed, and the TRA needs to abandon its inflexible structures and instead promote joint management abilities and build a new operational model. Only in this way can the TRA become more competitive and respond to new challenges.
A new operational model must be formulated based on the following principles. First, the TRA must minimize its organizational scale and service scope. Second, it must become operationally flexible. Third, operational responsibility must be clear. Fourth, customer service must be improved.
The purpose of restructuring the TRA would be transformation based on market principles, not merely change for the sake of it. The administration's management system needs to become adaptable in meeting its requirements. The restructuring plan should not be restricted to saving on wasteful expenditure or reducing inaccurate cost reporting and the misuse of funds, but should also develop an ability to tap into new sources of profit. Nor should it be a streamlining plan implementing mechanical cuts across the board, but rather a remodeling in pursuit of a reasonable structure.
The restructuring would not simply amount to privatization. Rather, it should be a plan to rebuild the administrative culture, revitalize the management system, improve operational efficiency and effectiveness, and safeguard the public interest.
Tu Chin-cheng is a graduate student in the political science department at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
RSS