Rand Corp recently published a book titled Entering the Dragon's Lair: Chinese Anti-access Strategies and their Implications for the United States. In the book, the US think tank listed the People's Liberation Army's (PLA) 10 tactical principles for defeating a technologically superior adversary: "Avoiding direct confrontation, exploiting US vulnerabilities decisively, seizing the initiative early, achieving victory through surprise, key-point strikes, paralyzing first and annihilating later, achieving information superiority, raising the cost of conflict, frustrating the adversary's strategic intention, undermining its resolve and determination and preventing it fighting the type of war it wants to fight."
Several of these principles are, in fact, the principles of guerilla warfare proposed by Mao Zedong (
"Avoiding the strengths and attacking the weakness of the enemy" means using delaying tactics to exhaust the US Army, undermine its resolve and prevent it from fighting the type of war it wants to fight.
Destroying the enemy's will to fight is what Sun Tzo (
How we overcome the PLA's psyops will be the foundation of establishing an unassailable position.
In 1928 Mao pointed out that "the Communist Party can only defeat its enemy with its left hand taking leaflets and right hand holding weapons." This mode of operations is similar to what the US did in the Gulf War and the Iraq War -- bombarding Baghdad with superior missiles on the one hand and publicizing its operations through the global media on the other. It could be argued that these are different in approach but equally satisfactory in result.
In recent years, China has intensified its media war against Taiwan. Beijing has tried numerous tactics, such as trying to give Taiwan pandas, promising tariff-free importation of Taiwanese agricultural items and allowing Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan.
China has also deployed more than 900 missiles aimed at Taiwan, showed off the performance of its F-10 fighters, successfully tested an anti-satellite weapon and worked on developing aircraft carriers.
Through military and non-military operations, China is trying to force the Taiwanese to surrender. It expects to conquer Taiwan without losing a soldier or firing a bullet.
The ultimate goal of the People's Republic of China (PRC) is to eliminate the Republic of China. The objective of the PRC's media warfare is to defeat Taiwan psychologically.
Whether we accept pandas from China as a show of goodwill or make a concession because of China's military intimidation, the end result is the same -- we are giving in to Beijing.
Therefore, only by recognizing the nature of China's warfare can we counter the PRC's tactics and maintain our psychological defenses. I hope our people understand this and remain on the alert.
Dai Kaifeng
Taichung
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS