The etiquette of business
Dear Johnny,
My name is M. I am the assistant to Mr B, who is a very well known portrait painter worldwide. I am asking with respect for your help in understanding the laws of business and social etiquette in Taiwan.
Mr B is having trouble in obtaining payment from a well-known society lady by the name of Ms X to the sum of US$11,000 for two portraits.
One portrait was of the vice president of the firm Y Ltd, of which Ms X was vice chairman, and the other was of her father, who was a prominent Chinese banker.
Ms X admits on paper that she has received the paintings and that she owes him money. She is, however, neglecting to complete the commission by paying her bill.
I would greatly appreciate your insight and knowledge.
With many thanks,
M.
Johnny replies: Needless to say, dear readers, I had to mask the names of the people and the company to run this letter.
M, there are a number of things that have to be said about the laws of business and social etiquette in Taiwan.
The first is that we have a kind of professional go-between that can facilitate communication between unhappy parties such as yourself and people who may have done them wrong. If the communication breaks down, this person can also arrange for the non-payer to be brought before a court. This go-between is known as a "lawyer."
There are lots of lawyers in Taiwan, though they charge a lot of money, and you might find it hard to end up with much of the cash for the paintings after legal expenses.
As far as social etiquette is concerned, you need not worry too much about cultural differences between East and West.
If Taiwanese people find out that they have not been paid for a good or a service, the usual reaction is: "Get Second Uncle and his friends on the line. Don't forget the baseball bats."
But if you want to go one step further and leave an indelible impression on your customer, I recommend you get in touch with my associate "Knuckles" Chiang in Chiayi. He knows a number of people who might be able to recover your money plus generous interest using far more intimate methods.
The problem is, you would need to fork out a lot more than US$11,000 to secure their "premium services."
So you would still come out behind, and even after an initial period of exhiliration, you might end up with a permanent blot on your conscience.
The final suggestion I have for you would be to come to Taiwan to launch a rescue bid for the painting. You might find it a bit intimidating, but you might also save the most money. Two return economy airfares from the US, a week or so of accommodation and food, and tools -- you're looking at about US$3,000.
Good luck, but remember: If you want to give "Knuckles" Chiang a call, I charge a commission. It's called "business etiquette."
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS