For thousands of years, presumably, the beginning of summer in Taiwan has seen the approach of the plum rains, a time when rainfall is at its heaviest -- excluding typhoons.
The plum rains can give people a shocking reminder of the sheer volume of water that Taiwan's skies can send crashing down after the drizzle of winter.
A number of factors have worsened the occasionally severe flooding that has always impacted on the Taipei Basin. One of these is erosion and the removal of trees and other older vegetation further up the catchment area.
All around Taiwan, rivers that once enjoyed a regular flow of water have been reduced to a trickle because of the lack of vegetative filters that would stagger the distribution of water over hours and days instead of a much shorter timeframe.
The other consequence of this is an increase in damage resulting from boulders and mud being washed downstream, never more spectacularly than the frightening wall of water and rock that crashed through Kukuan (
Another factor contributing to flood damage is the urbanization of what was always a low-lying area. Taipei is effectively a swamp with a man-made concrete shell, and there are times when the swamp and the water that falls on it will take no notice whatsoever of human convenience.
One might think that after this amount of time, therefore, people who live in areas prone to flooding might prepare for the rains and flooding with a little more rigor than has been apparent in Taipei City in the last few days.
Back in September 2001, when Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
The damage was greatly worsened by inept flood control measures, a controversy that dogs Ma to this day.
But it is simply ridiculous for governments to be held responsible for all flooding, everywhere. People who live in flood zones cannot be taken seriously if, after governments have provided an acceptable minimum of resources to fight flood damage, they complain as if officials are demigods with the power to halt rain. The ability to live with flooding is as necessary to people in these areas as living with the summer heat.
The truth is that flooding in greater Taipei -- particularly at Shezi Island (
But crippling damage is not. Where governments are demonstrably negligent, as Ma's was back in 2001, action against them is warranted.
But where flooding damages low-lying areas simply because they are low-lying areas, there is no cause for complaint. It is the responsibility of residents in these areas to assume that flooding will occur and to take every step possible beforehand, rather than complain to the government as if the plum rains had just visited Taiwan for the first time.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS