The presidential aspirations of former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
A last-ditch effort by Ma to unify his party's disparate elements has failed. Ma had to convince the one man whose support he needed, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
The Taiwanese electorate is often crudely described as having two regions: a pro-KMT, largely Mainlander/Hakka north; and a pro-Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), largely Hoklo south.
The reality is obviously much more complicated, but this dichotomy reflects certain realities. The results of every major national election since 2000 have shown that the electorate is almost evenly divided between pan-green and pan-blue supporters.
There is no reason to believe that next year's presidential election will buck this trend, which is why the major parties have tried to adopt a "moderate" or centrist posture, at least in theory.
This is why Wang's public slap in Ma's face may be heartening for the campaign of former premier Frank Hsieh (
But there is still a long time before the elections, and if the past is any guide, one thing that both parties can count on is trouble from within their own ranks. After all, under revised electoral rules that take effect this year, more than half of all sitting legislators will lose their jobs.
If Taiwanese politics seemed vitriolic before, just think of the mud-slinging and scandal-mongering yet to come as dozens of party hacks from across the spectrum jockey to protect their overpaid jobs and unwarranted influence.
Joseph Conrad, when writing Heart of Darkness more than 105 years ago, described perfectly a scene that sums up this kind of politicking:
"They beguiled the time by back-biting and intriguing against each other in a foolish kind of way. There was an air of plotting about that station, but nothing came of it, of course. It was as unreal as everything else -- as the philanthropic pretence of the whole concern, as their talk, as their government, as their show of work.
"The only real feeling was a desire to get appointed to a trading-post where ivory was to be had, so that they could earn percentages. They intrigued and slandered and hated each other only on that account -- but as to effectually lifting a little finger -- oh, no."
Taiwan's political leaders have proven that they are adept at intrigue and slandering and hating each other. What they have yet to show is that an individual exists in their ranks that can step forward and lead the nation to a better future.
This future will be built upon trust, stability and progress, not on suspicion, chaos and historical grudges.
So it may be too early to develop any firm ideas about how the upcoming months will play out on the political stage, but it is undoubtedly high time that people started calling for enlightenment in the way that political debate is conducted.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS