Iraq is a tragic problem for the US and its allies, but hopefully a temporary one. Thankfully the old USSR is gone, no matter how hard Vladimir Putin might attempt to put it together again. But another potential superpower makes many Americans uneasy: China.
China is increasingly asserting itself around the globe.
With the world's largest population, swiftly growing economy, ancient culture, and authoritarian politics, the People's Republic of China (PRC) is seen as an almost inevitable US rival. Some analysts even view war as likely.
The Council on Foreign Relations recently released a new task force report on US-China relations, filled with the usual generic recommendations: "Improving economic relations," "Enhancing security relations," "Encouraging political reform," etc. Whether there is political will on both sides of the Pacific to achieve these ends is the real issue.
Even today, any confrontation between the US and the PRC, a nuclear-armed power with regional reach, would be far different than US' wars with Serbia and Iraq. A future US-China conflict could become a global conflagration.
Moreover, a friendly PRC could help resolve a range of lesser security and political issues, such a potential nuclear North Korea. Finally, there's the potential benefit of a continuing economic relationship. Whither relations between the two nations? There's no cause for the touch of paranoia that afflicts some US policymakers. Today the US stands astride the globe as a colossus, with the world's most productive economy, dominant military, and ubiquitous culture. Equally important, the People's Republic of China is no substitute for the Soviet Union.
Uncle Sam need not follow an "anything goes" policy so long as US companies make money. But the worst strategy would be to treat the PRC as an enemy.
First, China is no longer communist in the traditional sense, with as much as two-thirds of the economy outside of government control, increasing personal autonomy, and not even a pretense of promoting world revolution. With only a hint of a smile Chinese officials spoke to me in Beijing of "socialism with Chinese characteristics." Second, international integration has helped erode China's old totalitarian state. Foreign investment and trade have given China a stake in a peaceful global order.
Third, though Shanghai, Beijing, and other leading cities should impress visitors, rural China remains a century behind. Chinese officials estimate Shanghai's per capita GDP at about US$14,000, but that of China nationally at only US$1,700.
In 2005 America's per capita GDP ran to US$42,000. Assuming recent growth rates continue -- unlikely as the Chinese economy matures -- the PRC's GDP won't surpass that of the US until 2035, and even then the US' per capita production will be four times as great.
Fourth, trade with China is largely beneficial to the US. Although disputes dominate news headlines, similar concerns emerged and ultimately disappeared regarding Japan. Today few Americans worry about Japan overtaking the US.
Fifth, the PRC isn't likely to catch up to the US militarily until mid-century at the earliest.
Beijing will be able to match the US in East Asia more quickly, but Washington's current advantage has always been artificial: the US cannot expect to forever dominate every region on earth.
Maintaining US influence will require thoughtful diplomacy and economic openness.
But Washington has the advantage of being allied with most of China's neighbors.
Of course, the PRC pessimists could be right. But treating China as an inevitable enemy and embarking upon a strategy of containment are far more likely to turn the PRC hostile.
Nor is such a policy sustainable. None of Washington's friends in East Asia want to turn themselves into a target of China. Engaging in economic war makes no more sense. Maybe such a policy would hurt the PRC more than the US, but it would be mutually destructive in any case.
Perhaps most important, the US should put its own house in order. Washington should push freer trade throughout Asia, develop a cooperative strategy towards China with allied states, and improve its international image.
The US also should improve its economic competitiveness.
China today is more free, more prosperous, and more responsible than China only a few years ago. There still is reason for the US to be watchful and wary about Beijing's policies.
But the US is acting from a position of strength, and should confidently engage, rather than timidly isolate, what is likely to be the world's next great power.
The benefits of cementing a mutually constructive relationship in the coming decades would be enormous.
Doug Bandow is vice president of Citizen Outreach and the Cobden Fellow in International Economics at IPI.
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS