While I admire Tony Weir's vision of a green future for Taiwan ("Letters," May 9, Page 8), I also agree that it won't happen very soon.
Although the government professes concern for the environment, I feel very little is being done to educate people. I am reminded daily of how little the public knows even about basic issues.
For example, over the past year I have yet to see any shopper use a recycled bag instead of the plastic or paper ones offered at supermarkets, shopping malls, street stalls or markets. If such a simple change in attitude cannot be implemented, getting rid of petrol vehicles would be an unsurmountable challenge.
Sports utility vehicles and other recreational vehicles are mushrooming in my neighborhood. However, the government isn't doing anything to encourage consumers to even consider more environmentally friendly cars.
Despite US President George W. Bush administration's terrible record on environmental protection, hybrid car buyers in the US receive incentives, such as tax rebates.
Unfortunately, in Taiwan, the extremely high price tag on these hybrids make it difficult for many to consider buying such new technology.
Clearly, the government has a lot more work to do in order to reduce Taiwan's carbon footprint.
Jesse Chalfin
Changhua
It is interesting to note that the cars advertised in the Web sites mentioned in Tony Weir's letter sell for US$90,000 and above, which is by no means within the income range of most Taiwanese, nor a majority of people anywhere.
These cars use lithium batteries, which are expensive given the technology used in their production. Better economies of scale are unlikely to drastically reduce lithium battery's production costs, as the market is already quite mature and very competitive. There may be produceres who are working on developing a new, low-cost battery that offers the same level of efficiency, but that has yet to happen.
For now, the only economically feasible alternative will be pure hybrids, which though dependent on a gasoline motor, offer huge improvements in efficiency and energy-saving techniques such as using the energy from braking to recharge the battery.
Michael Grimes
Tainan
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS