Effigies and the afterlife
Dear Johnny,
I think you decry the Taiwanese treatment of care workers too much ("Wangker the DPP bigot flips out," April 28, page 8). Isn't it a fact that along with the paper money and the paper Benz, they are now burning effigies of Indonesians and Filipinas in ancestor-worship ceremonies?
What more could these devoted servants ask for than to spend eternity alongside their beloved employer?
Tony Goodwin
Banciao
Johnny replies: I could think of many things they could ask for in the afterlife, Tony, starting with a 40-hour week.
Aircon for missionaries
Dear Johnny,
Your article "Tips for vulnerable missionaries" (April 14, page 8) had me almost peeing my pants I was laughing so hard.
I am an American living in Taiwan with my Taiwanese wife and child. I met my wife in the US when she was attending college in Ohio for her master's degree, and I knew little about Taiwan except that China was always posturing and bullying it, and that a lot of things in the US had "Made in Taiwan" labels.
So I don't understand why anyone would come here with an agenda of converting people to a religion they think is proper for others, like the Mormons. When I see those American, Canadian or wherever-they-are-from idiots riding around in neckties on bikes, I feel a slight nausea that they think they are so right about religion and that Taiwan, or anywhere else that isn't Mormon, is wrong.
The history of missions is stained with the spreading of beliefs and the spilling of some blood along the way. In my humble opinion, I believe in "live and let live."
I have studied plenty of different religions in my life, and my conclusion is that any group of people that pushes its beliefs on you is simply wrong and elitist. They should be banned from Taiwan completely, and pushing religion in this matter is surely a safety hazard at the least. Nobody needs to be saved here. Saved from what?
Developed religions that are pushed on you like drugs? More like cults, in my mind. If these "Christian" families really want to save people, why not go to Afghanistan or Iraq? Surely those places need Mormons cruising around on bikes spreading the Word in the hot desert sun.
I tell you why they're not there. Because they would be dragged to the center of town, videotaped, stoned and beheaded. So Mormon and Christian families choose the "safe" countries like Taiwan to prey on people. Wow, that really is suffering for God.
I wonder if their Taipei apartments have air conditioning? Summer is coming.
Alonzo Lively
Taichung
Johnny replies: I'm surprised about the number of letters I received on the missionaries column. It's hardly a pressing issue for this country, yet it seems to rile people like very few other topics.
Missionaries are united by a feeling that people need to be improved. Some of them have good will and are respectful of local beliefs -- even if they one day hope to change them -- while others are presumptuous and do their churches no favors by selling their agenda in arrogant and patronizing ways.
But missionaries in Taiwan are a harmless anachronism. You should be grateful we don't get the ones that would go to Afghanistan or Iraq if they had to. Then people would actually have to think about their faith. Scary.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS