So people are being killed by petrol-engine pollution ("Taipei Air Pollution alarming: scientists," page 2, May 4). The only real surprise here is that it took until this year for somebody to actually notice, but the solution is extremely simple. Get rid of petrol vehicles.
Not after the elections; not after more studies; now, today.
If you don't believe it's possible, take a look at Phoenix Motorcars electric trucks (www.phoenixmotorcars.com), the electric sports cars from Tesla and Venturi (www.teslamotors.com, and www.venturi.fr) and Zap scooters (www.zapworld.com).
Modern electric vehicles (EVs) outperform petrol vehicles in fuel efficiency, performance and reliability, and they can recharge in minutes.
They're not entirely non-polluting, because their electricity ultimately comes from power stations.
However, they do have an effective fuel efficiency 10 times to 20 times better than petrol engines for city driving, and pollution from power stations is more easily scrubbed than car exhaust smoke.
The EVs mentioned above are designed in the US and Europe.
Why is Taiwan not leading the world with this technology?
Dense cities, short freeways and personal preference for small transport such as scooters make EVs a natural choice.
Cheap supplies of motors and lithium cells from China, and a large readymade domestic market would make EVs affordable for everyone.
Two things are lacking: superstar designers who can produce the kind of eye-catching products that (for example) the French and Italians are famous for; and a government willing to defy big oil and big corporations.
Despite many people having a college degree in Taiwan, there are few outstanding engineers, artists and designers, and the little talent there is get no respect.
Taiwanese corporations are still obsessed with being cheaper, not better.
There is no excuse for this. Government reticence is more understandable: refusing to import American SUVs would almost certainly cause reprisals.
However, with care and statesmanship, it could be done.
Imports of US cars would be replaced by imports of US know-how and high-tech materials, and the US might be reminded of their insistence that "less developed" countries cut their carbon emissions.
The process could start gently, with electric buses and taxis.
Taxis could be banned from customer-trawling and taxi call points installed at convenient locations.
Cars would be next; they take up far too much space and are responsible for most road deaths.
Heavy fuel tax and VAT on petrol cars could subsidize electric scooters and public park-and-charge installations.
Existing petrol cars would fall apart after 10 years to 15 years and EVs would naturally take over.
The next stage would be to get the drivers off the roads, eliminating road accidents as well as pollution.
Electric vehicles are very amenable to automatic control; again, because of Taiwan's unique geography and demographics, it would be especially easy to implement.
Of course, it won't happen.
Automatic EVs would reduce Taiwan's dependence on foreign oil, cut vehicle pollution and scrap-vehicle waste, make commuting more efficient, reduce the need for more MRT services, and massively reduce health-service costs.
Would these measures win votes? No.
Tony Weir
Taipei
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Alarm bells over a “hollowing out” of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry and US demands for “protection money” have fueled a panic over Taiwan. To understand how misplaced these fears are, consider the movements of global technology giants. Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) CEO Lisa Su (蘇姿丰) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) could undoubtedly understand the situation best, and they continue to make key investments in Taiwan. They do not make decisions on a whim. They are the architects of global computing power strategy and possess the highest levels of industry knowledge. No
RSS