There was no political motivation when the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee said "no" to China's planned route for the Olympic torch. And Taiwanese should continue to say "no" to any attempts to belittle the nation's sovereignty.
Based on China's plan, the Olympic torch would pass by Taiwan twice -- on its way to Japan and to Vietnam -- but Beijing chose not to make any of these stops.
Taiwan had been trying to negotiate with China over the torch's route for years to no avail. Now some, notably China supporters in Taiwan, call Taiwan's rejection a political move. In other places, Taiwanese were called "Taiwan Nationalists" and equated to Chinese nationalism, German nationalism and Zionism.
Why do Taiwanese always get blamed for trying to be free, from being victimized by expansionists from Japan, China and the US? The movement to wipe out Taiwanese culture and language started in 1947, exactly 60 years ago. Sixty years may be too long, but it was not too long ago that Chinese started their massacre in Tibet. Both of these atrocities were committed by the Chinese.
Taiwan has been victimized politically, culturally and intellectually because of its geographical location. Whichever way you look at it, it is the Chinese who have politicized the Olympic Games.
While the Tibetans have foreigners protesting on their behalf, who speaks for the Taiwanese? We, the Taiwanese, have every right to speak for ourselves, and should continue to say "no" to those who discriminate against us.
Rao Kok-sian
Winchester, Massachusetts
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
In A phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Xi is reported to have stated that in his view, “Taiwan’s return to China” is to be considered an integral part of the post-World War II international order. Never mind that China under Xi has been trying to undermine the liberal post-war international order by setting up alternative organizations and schemes that are detrimental to freedom and democracy around the world. Its own repression of Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong are vivid examples. The “return to China” is the biggest misnomer: Taiwan has never ever been part
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman