It would be difficult to overstate the likely impact on Taiwan of last week's free-trade agreement (FTA) between South Korea and the US, because South Korea and Taiwan produce many similar products and are rivals in key industrial sectors.
But the strange thing is that few -- especially in the media -- saw the issue as being as serious as trade officials and analysts did. Most daily newspapers last week displayed such an indifference to the trade pact it was as though it had never happened. Instead, these newspapers were reporting on the campaign activities of the potential candidates for next year's presidential election, the proposals to allow auto and horse racing and politicians bickering over issues of ethnicity.
On the bright side, the South Korea-US trade pact could encourage the US to develop more bilateral free-trade agreements in the region, as countries fear they may fall behind in the race to cut trade barriers.
Most importantly, though, if the pact is ratified by lawmakers in both countries, South Korean companies will receive advantageous access to the US market, which would in turn put many Taiwanese firms at a potential disadvantage. In other words, it would not only make South Korea's economy more competitive but also result in US trade being lost by Taiwan and gained by South Korea.
Based on a study conducted by the Chung Hua Institute for Economic Research, approximately US$2 billion worth of goods are shipped to the US from Taiwan each year, goods that could be replaced by those from South Korea.
Those US$2 billion goods are likely to be shipped from South Korea once the lower, or zero, tariffs agreed in the FTA take effect. That would represent a potential loss of approximately 5 percent of Taiwan's annual shipments to the US, or 0.5 percent of the nation's GDP growth.
Some economists have warned that a South Korea-US deal would negatively impact on Taiwanese firms, particularly those in traditional manufacturing sectors such as textiles, automobiles, bicycles and shoes, and urged the government to accelerate its own trade talks with Washington. Others believe that Taiwanese manufacturers would be able to survive the South Korean competition as they have shifted production offshore to retain a price advantage.
The South Korea-US trade deal is likely to increase the pressure on other Asian countries to seek similar pacts, and, as long as Taiwan's economy is heavily export-oriented, it also needs to negotiate similar pacts with its trading partners.
It is lamentable that the "China factor" has been used as an excuse to slow the progress of the nation's FTA negotiations, and so far Taiwan has only managed to secure FTAs with some Central American allies, including Panama, Guatemala and Nicaragua. But the trend toward trade agreements is not going to stop and the government needs to catch up and better prepare for the imminent changes in trading patterns that these agreements will bring.
Whether the plan is to achieve FTAs with other countries or the nation looks to join a Free-Trade Area of Asia Pacific -- a free trade area proposed by APEC leaders at their summit in Vietnam last November -- the government should study the South Korea-US deal carefully and use it as a starting point for their future talks.
For now, the government should be watchful, because, with no immediate possibility of new trade pacts, large Taiwanese manufacturers may well respond by shifting even more production overseas, adding to concerns about economic isolation. As for the future of Taiwanese firms, without the promise of FTAs to remove tariffs and other trade barriers, all they can do is strive to enhance their competitiveness and quality, nothing else.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
RSS