Lucifer Chu (
Chu has become a millionaire by producing Chinese translations of fantasy novels. Using much of the US$1 million in royalties from his versions of The Lord of the Rings, Chu says he devotes himself to distributing free translations of material from a Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Web site.
When MIT introduced its OpenCourseWare project six years ago, it was a radical departure. The project was intended to make virtually all of the institute's course materials available online -- free -- over a 10-year period at the cost of US$100 million. (The material is provided under a creative common license, which, among other things, forbids its being used for commercial purposes, but allows it to be copied and used for other purposes.)
The university's good intentions came with some concerns: It's not easy to share the lecture notes, slide presentations, sample tests, syllabuses and reading lists that go into an MIT course. First, faculty members have to agree to go along. Also, the 25 people who work on OpenCourseWare have had to obtain permission to use other people's creative work that crops up in the slides and lectures. Finally, there was the concern that if MIT gives away this material, would students still pay the US$33,600 tuition to attend? It should go without saying that MIT has continued to fill its classes, and that the piece of parchment with a graduate's name on it, or even a realistic copy, still cannot be found online.
If anything, university officials say, the material has served to stoke the interest of potential applicants.
"A student was going to be coming to MIT as an undergrad, and he sent me an e-mail that said he had already attended my lectures," said Anant Agarwal, whose lectures for the introductory electrical engineering course are available as streaming video at the OpenCourseWare site, ocw.mit.edu. "And he was from Malaysia."
In fact, things have been moving swimmingly, administrators say. By the end of the year, the first phase should be over, said Steve Carson, the project's director of external relations, with nearly all 1,800 courses having some sort of representation online; the cost has been US$30 million. Currently, there are more than 1,600 courses published, and 2 million visits a month.
"It is so much bigger than we could have ever imagined," said Shigeru Miyagawa, a professor of linguistics and Japanese, who was on the committee that originally proposed the plan. "The number of visits that we get is beyond belief. We really didn't know who would be using it when we went into this at the very beginning."
The president of MIT at the time, Charles Vest, anticipated as much, saying that "there will probably be a lot of uses that will really surprise us and that we can't really predict."
Chu's efforts qualify as a pleasant surprise. His team, which includes four full-time editors and scores of volunteers, has completed translations of 178 courses, and more than 600 partial ones. Thirty-five are good enough that MIT links to them directly.
Chu personally worked on the introduction to electromagnetism, a subject that had bedeviled him at National Central University in Taiwan. He flunked it two times, he said.
"I couldn't help thinking that if I could have gotten a decent electrical magnetism teacher, and had it gone better, maybe I could be working at a big company in Taiwan," he said.
Chu is proof that even translators can lose something in translation. He says he innocently adopted the English first name Lucifer as a teenager because of its poetic meaning in Latin, "light bearer."
Today, he says he travels Taiwan and China speaking on the opportunities from OpenCourseWare, using his royalty money to address an estimated total audience of 50,000, telling them to take advantage of "good people with the good will to share their knowledge."
The MIT OpenCourseWare Web site demands a lot from its visitors. One must decide what subject to study from a vast array, and then must show the determination of a true self-starter.
There is, for example, the graduate-level course "Topics in Philosophy of Language: Vagueness," offered in the fall of 2005.
The course promises it will "give people a sense of what `accounting for vagueness' is all about, why it's hard and why it's important."
There is a reading list, a syllabus and a sample paper.
While "Vagueness" is certainly on one end of the spectrum, there are relatively few courses that hold your hand.
A class on archery presents a litany of short clips showing how to hold a bow and arrow, and roughly 25 introductory courses have their lectures on videotape or audiotape.
Anne Margulies, executive director of OpenCourseWare, said that, "the best thing MIT can do is share what we have here to those who can't come here and hope others would do the same thing."
To that end, MIT has been promoting a consortium of schools to expand the materials available here and around the world.
Chu is unabashed in his enthusiasm of his nonprofit project, with the sly name OOPS, for "Opensource Opencourseware Prototype System," at www.myoops.org. And he cites a lesson that he says he learned from Isaac Asimov's Foundation science fiction series, a translation project that he has put on indefinite hold: "Knowledge can solve any problems -- people choose bad leaders mostly because they don't have enough knowledge."
During the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum’s third leadership summit on Aug. 31, US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun said that the US wants to partner with the other members of the Quadrilaterial Security Dialogue — Australia, India and Japan — to establish an organization similar to NATO, to “respond to ... any potential challenge from China.” He said that the US’ purpose is to work with these nations and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to “create a critical mass around the shared values and interest of those parties,” and possibly attract more countries to establish an alliance comparable to
On August 24, 2020, the US Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, made an important statement: “The Pentagon is Prepared for China.” Going forward, how might the Department of Defense team up with Taiwan to make itself even more prepared? No American wants to deter the next war by a paper-thin margin, and no one appreciates the value of strategic overmatch more than the war planners at the Pentagon. When the stakes are this high, you can bet they want to be super ready. In recent months, we have witnessed a veritable flood of high-level statements from US government leaders on
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new