The government and various non-governmental organizations are always touting global recognition for the country, focusing on its developed status and the high-tech products it produces.
Unfortunately, a negative view of Taiwan is usually portrayed in the Western media, much of which is deserved. One example is, the attention given to the dreadful treatment of overseas workers and the slave trade.
However, we now have proof that the poor worker in Taiwan is paid such a low minimum wage that he or she may almost be living in Third World poverty.
The fact that this pittance has not risen for 10 years is another shocking expose of this country's values.
Needless to say, a minimum hourly wage, and it has to be assessed on an hourly basis, should reflect the cost of living. Taking today's price index into consideration. a fair rate would be in excess of NT$180. This is not inflationary, as it counteracts inflation by fueling the economy with consumers spending more.
Put simply, if you are Taiwanese, you should ask yourself this question: Would you buy a car, computer or an apartment made by a person who works more than 60 hours per week and is being paid only NT$100 per hour? Would you expect the product to be high quality? If your honest answer is "no," then do not expect Western consumers to buy your products!
It is no excuse to quote company bosses who complain about competition from China and other Asian countries. The Japanese learned this lesson, and through hard work they developed high quality products while managing to pay a decent wage.
It's all a question of ethics. It appears that many Taiwanese employers have no conscience.
This negative publicity may even lead to a boycott of many Taiwanese products in the West, especially when companies are exposed for maltreating foreign workers and generally using working practices reminiscent of a Dickens novel.
The CLA should listen to the working people and stop kowtowing to business leaders.
Pete John
London, England
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
Numerous expert analyses characterize today’s US presidential election as a risk for Taiwan, given that the two major candidates, US Vice President Kamala Harris and former US president Donald Trump, are perceived to possess divergent foreign policy perspectives. If Harris is elected, many presume that the US would maintain its existing relationship with Taiwan, as established through the American Institute in Taiwan, and would continue to sell Taiwan weapons and equipment to help it defend itself against China. Under the administration of US President Joe Biden, whose political views Harris shares, the US on Oct. 25 authorized arms transfers to Taiwan, another
Navy Commander Admiral Tang Hua (唐華) said in an interview with The Economist that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has been implementing an “anaconda strategy” to subdue Taiwan since President William Lai (賴清德) assumed office. The Chinese military is “slowly, but surely” increasing its presence around Taiwan proper, it quoted Tang as saying. “They are ready to blockade Taiwan at any time they want,” he said. “They give you extreme pressure, pressure, pressure. They’re trying to exhaust you.” Beijing’s goal is to “force Taiwan to make mistakes,” Tang said, adding that they could be “excuses” for a blockade. The interview reminds me