China and Taiwan became members of the WTO on Nov. 10, 2001 and Jan. 1, 2002 respectively. As Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), an expert on international politics and law, pointed out in an October 2002 article entitled "The Status of WTO Members," the WTO operates on the principle of equality, not the so-called "one China" principle.
Chiang also pointed out that Taiwan entered the WTO under the name the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (TPKM) in accordance with Article 12 of the WTO agreement, while Hong Kong joined in accordance with Article 26 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. There are clear differences between the two.
Chiang strongly condemned China for applying the Hong Kong model -- a region over which China has sovereign powers -- to the TPKM within the WTO framework. Beijing's claim that cross-strait economic and trade relations within the WTO framework are a domestic matter lacks legal foundation and is completely illogical.
The influence of the WTO -- which many view as the UN of business -- is much greater than that of the UN, because the WTO is able to formulate trade regulations within the legal framework and thus resolve conflicts among its members.
After Taiwan's WTO accession, its requests for business information and negotiation with other members have been smooth and beneficial. Once a trade conflict ensues, it can be resolved on the basis of transparency and equality -- factors that are crucial to Taiwan's economic development.
To suppress Taiwan's economic development and international space, China has repeatedly resorted to legal warfare. Be-tween May and June 2005, the title of Taiwan's representative in the WTO's address book was changed arbitrarily. During a global fisheries' meeting in Geneva on March 1 and March 2, Chinese officials even pressured the WTO secretariat to change Taiwan's national title to "Taiwan Province, China" on all documents. In the face of Taiwan's protests, the secretariat merely "expressed its regret" but did not change the name.
This move was a severe infringement of Taiwan's rights as a WTO member and a violation of the fundamental spirit of the organization.
On the eve of the second anniversary of China's passage of the "Anti-Secession" Law, Beijing's attempts to suppress Taiwan were evident everywhere. Taiwan is an official member of the WTO. Based on the organization's fundamental spirit and principle of equality, we strongly condemn China's oppression and urge the public to see its true colors. No one should have any illusions about China.
Translated by Eddy Chang
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS