There is a long-held Beijing-inspired misperception among international observers that Taiwanese independence is a move by a local province to break away from the motherland -- somewhat similar to Quebec's move to split from Canada.
The Taiwanese independence movement is more similar to that of the US' move to independence, as Taiwan has historically been colonized by various parties, including: the Portuguese, the Spaniards, the Dutch, the Chinese, the Japanese and then the Chinese again.
The Taiwanese independence movement is thus a form of decolonization.
This explains why in spite of nearly 15 years of democratization, Taiwan doesn't seem much closer to full independence. Colonialism stubbornly lives on in Taiwan, and this can be attributed to the treacherous nature of the last colonial occupation brought forth by the late dictator Chiang Kai-shek (
The first two decades of KMT rule of Taiwan was remarkable for its lack of plans for Taiwan other than to milk it for the purpose of either supporting the KMT's war in China against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or financing Chiang's fantasy of retaking China.
Even while forcing 6 million Taiwanese to feed and shelter 1 million shell-shocked Chinese refugees, the KMT's economic policy for Taiwan consisted of little more than speeding up minting of Taiwanese currency.
The inevitable consequence was rampant inflation, which saw the prices of consumer staples soaring more than ten-fold each year from 1945 through 1949. Reality set in when the KMT government issued new Taiwanese currency to reflect the shrinkage of public wealth on paper -- to the tune of replacing 40,000 old Taiwan dollars with one new Taiwan dollar, thus lightening every Taiwanese's pocket, both figuratively and literally.
Amid the plundering, the KMT's strong-arm tactics gave rise to the 228 Incident, which resulted in the slaughter of tens of thousands of by and large unarmed Taiwanese. The death toll was estimated at one in every 300 Taiwanese.
To buttress its post-atrocity control, the KMT imposed martial law and the period of White Terror that ensued silenced Taiwanese for 38 years -- and the power and effect of that intimidation linger on to this day.
In 1971, Chiang's colonialist mindset did arguably the most far-reaching damage to Taiwan when he turned down an offer to allow Taiwan to retain a seat on the UN after Beijing took over China's seat.
The KMT's hankering for the old colonial government never waned over the past three decades. With pan-blue stalwarts Lien Chan (
Their visits, together with China's economic boom, appear to have fueled the reemergence of Chinese colonial yearning in Taiwan, albeit with one distinction: The baton of colonialism has now been handed over to the second generation of Chiang adherents.
What's sobering is they continue to find support among Taiwanese -- evidence of how 60 years of China-centric education and captive mentality have taken their toll on Taiwanese.
The rank of these bleeding-hearts might not be significant enough to recall the enthusiastic welcome Taiwanese gullibly showered on the first batch of Chinese to arrive in Taiwan after the end of World War II before relations turned sour.
But it should be a wake-up call for those who do not want history to repeat itself. It is time to stop the KMT and Beijing from luring and using Taiwanese for economic expedience.
There are two facets to building Taiwan's statehood, one internal and the other external.
Decolonization would constitute the entirety of the internal struggle while externally Taiwan has to look to the US to acquire any residual sovereignty. It is increasingly evident that the US was the last clear holder of Taiwan's sovereignty before controversy set in more than 60 years ago.
For years, Washington has been holding this residual sovereignty as a license to meddle in Taiwan's democratization at the behest of Beijing and on account of Washington and Beijing's mutual aversion to confrontation.
In order to be effective in a democracy, the interference has had to take advantage of Taiwan's internal polarization. Consequently, the effect of that residual sovereignty would be inversely proportional to the extent of Taiwan's decolonization such that US recognition should be automatic at the completion of Taiwan's internal success. It would simply go against the US' founding principles for Washington to turn its back on a people that desire to be free of colonial exploitation.
In summary, domestic consolidation to rid Taiwan of colonialism is the key to Taiwan's struggle for formal statehood. Once that is accomplished, other pieces will fall into place.
Given that Beijing's claim on Taiwanese territory is scarcely more than an insidious attempt at imposing new Chinese colonialism on Taiwan and that Beijing relies on a collaborating coalition of pan-blue leaders, the decolonization of Taiwan wouldn't succeed without a thorough political trouncing of this proxy of Beijing.
The next nationwide election might pose the earliest such opportunity, given the KMT's recent vow that once it regains power, the party would reverse the latest wave of name change masterminded by the current administration.
The battle is thus joined. And, Taiwan's independence war continues.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously