Transitional justice is an important part of Taiwan's path to social equality, justice and normal statehood. Improving social equality and justice includes uncovering the truth about the 228 Incident and the return of the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) stolen assets to the public. The march toward obtaining normal statehood includes the urgently required correction of the national title and the creation of a new constitution. These issues are currently been forcefully promoted and, though challenging, the creation of a new constitution has become an increasingly urgent task.
Let's look at two perspectives on the need for a new constitution.
First, a "one China" Constitution runs counter to the current cross-strait status quo. Creating a constitution for one's own country should be the natural order of things. Taiwan is a sovereign state; therefore, creating a new constitution does not change the status quo but is a true reflection of it. The idea of "one China" [including both China and Taiwan] is long outdated. More than 60 percent of people in Taiwan identify themselves as Taiwanese. Thus, neither domestic opposition nor the international community -- including the US, Japan and China -- have any reason to oppose Taiwan's creating a new constitution either by obstruction or threats.
Second, amending the Constitution is a formidable challenge. In 2005, the mission-oriented National Assembly amended the Constitution and designed a high threshold for constitutional amendments by requiring that three-quarters of all legislators are present at the vote, and that three-quarters of those present vote for the amendment. The amendment must then be put to a referendum where half of the total electorate must approve and pass the proposal. Implementing such high requirements is no different from blocking Taiwan from normalizing its status as a country.
Furthermore, the 2005 Constitutional amendment, the seventh, is fraught with problems. Not only does the mission-oriented National Assembly lack legitimacy and sufficient representativeness because of its small membership, but there is also a lack of social consensus behind the amendment because the final decision was made after a compromise only between the Democratic Progressive Party and the KMT, the two largest political parties.
This further highlights the difficulties in achieving normal country status through constitutional amendment. The problem is three-fold. First, cutting the number of legislative seats could well result in another "eternal" legislature [like the one that was elected in China in 1948 and remained in place until 1992]. It also expands the power of legislators and gives advantages to incumbents.
Second, the result of the single-member district double-ballot system beginning with the next legislative elections is that all votes are not equal. For example, the new system stipulates that each city and county elect at least one legislator, which means that a vote in cities and counties with small populations like Kinmen and Matsu will be more influential than a vote in counties and cities with higher populations. This violates democratic principles.
Third, single-vote districts may result in M-shaped public opinion, since candidates in the end will be forced to make ideological appeals to pan-blue or pan-green supporters which will only further promote the creation of a politically M-shaped society.
In the 1990s, former president Lee Teng-hui (
Margot Chen is a research fellow at Taiwan Advocates, a think tank initiated by former president Lee Teng-hui.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known affectionately as “Big S,” recently passed away from pneumonia caused by the flu. The Mandarin word for the flu — which translates to “epidemic cold” in English — is misleading. Although the flu tends to spread rapidly and shares similar symptoms with the common cold, its name easily leads people to underestimate its dangers and delay seeking medical treatment. The flu is an acute viral respiratory illness, and there are vaccines to prevent its spread and strengthen immunity. This being the case, the Mandarin word for “influenza” used in Taiwan should be renamed from the misleading