Yesterday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma announced his resignation as he promised he would if indicted, but he also announced his presidential candidacy.
Seeing its hopes of returning to power next year diminishing, the pan-blue camp is panicking. Followers of Ma and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Some KMT members argue that the nation should not be deprived of a presidential candidate solely because of some "absurd" indictment. They have abolished the party's black-gold clause, which calls for the suspension of party membership in the case of an indictment -- a regulation that was introduced by Ma -- and originally hoped to relieve Ma of his pledge to resign as chairman if indicted.
Others are hoping Ma will decide to run as a pan-blue independent. Still others say that he should continue with a KMT presidential bid regardless of the consequences.
All of these groups are actually helping to damage Ma's political credibility.
With party regulations changing so that Ma can become the KMT's presidential candidate, voters will question his integrity.
If Ma persists in his quest for the presidency, it will be difficult for him to claim to be different from President Chen Shui-bian (
When the first family tries to delay the legal progress of first lady Wu Shu-jen's (
On the other hand, running as an independent candidate and waging war on former party comrades would generate the ugliest pan-blue split vote ever seen. Wang's supporters say that any attempt to amend the party charter to benefit Ma will have consequences. It will be intriguing to see what consequences these are.
The campaign to depose Chen called for integrity, but now the pan-blue camp does not want to abide by these principles. If Ma proceeds with this course of action, it will not only mar his reputation, but also make it impossible for the KMT to talk about rules of any nature with credibility.
A Harvard doctor of law and a former justice minister should not take this approach. He cannot justify his preferential treatment to those who have been disciplined in accordance with the party charter in the past.
On the same day, Ma has been indicted for corruption and has shown disregard for the spirit of law by challenging the KMT to endorse him.
The pan-blue camp may be willing to turn a blind eye to Ma's indictment, but the public may not be as charitable.
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman
President William Lai’s (賴清德) historic announcement on Wednesday, Nov. 26, of a supplemental defense budget valued in excess of US$40 billion is a testament to the seriousness with which Taiwan is responding to the relentless expansionist ambitions of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the Chinese Communist Party and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Lai is responding to the threat posed to Taiwan sovereignty along with US President Donald Trump’s insistence that American partners in good standing must take on more responsibility for their own defense. The supplemental defense budget will be broken into three main parts. The first and largest piece
RSS