Abbe Pierre, the radical priest with the black beret who became the conscience of the French nation, died on Jan. 22. Not a single Taiwanese newspaper mentioned his death. But at his funeral ceremony at Notre Dame de Paris in France, French President Jacques Chirac and members of his government, representatives from the opposition parties, intellectuals and the public formed a huge crowd.
His death was deeply moving because he dedicated his life to fighting for universal solidarity across the lines of nationality, race and religion.
Abbe Pierre was not perfect, as the Taipei Times knew well. Two years ago the paper reprinted an article from the Guardian ("Sex confessions of `saint' shock French Catholics," Oct. 29, 2005, page 6).
The article implied that his "sex confessions" were as important as his fight for human rights and democracy.
The photo that accompanied the article was also misleading, because Abbe Pierre, 93, was flanked by women belonging to his secular organization for the homeless, Emma, which recycled and sold unwanted objects.
I wonder why journalists and editors persist in denying the public non-misleading, objective reporting.
I assume that editors and journalists are part of the class of Taiwanese intellectuals and as such I think it is fair to expect better.
Local newspapers barely mentioned the seventh World Social Forum in Nairobi. Instead, they focused on the World Economic Forum, without even informing the public about the differences between the two.
The World Social Forum is an open meeting place, where movements from civil society meet to discuss concrete actions on the local and international level to solve problems such as poverty, social inequality and environmental devastation that are the by-products of globalization.
I wonder whether any Taiwanese have participated in this kind of forum to understand and support an alternative process of globalization. I don't understand why so many intellectuals and government officials are neglecting such an important issue.
Another article also caught my attention. When I read a recent Taipei Times article about plagiarism, ("Ethical Problems Concern Academics," Jan. 24, page 2), I noticed that an anatomy professor in one of the nation's most prestigious medical institutions spoke on the condition of anonymity in an interview.
He indicated that the academic world's "publish or perish" mentality may have forced researchers to risk their careers and integrity by manipulating the results of their work.
In that article, an assistant professor of public health said professors were overloaded with teaching hours.
The article reads: "Most ... time is now spent on teaching classes and preparing for classes ... which leaves very little time to perform quality research."
Why do professors accept this unreasonable situation?
The above examples prove that most Taiwanese intellectuals lack critical thinking and are reluctant to think outside the box. This is not suitable in a democratic system. It will no doubt take its toll on the public's awareness of important issues and social development in Taiwan.
What exactly is the mission of intellectuals?
"Intellect" comes from the Latin verb "intellegere," meaning to use "cognitive ability" and to "delve into ideas, books, the essence of the mind."
So an intellectual is supposed to read, understand what she or he is reading and check the genuineness of the content. The intellectual should then put knowledge to use to improve society. Being an intellectual is not something to cast aside as soon as one gets a diploma. An intellectual never stops learning and fighting for the improvement of society.
The intellectual must even be ready to sacrifice her or his own life for this goal. We cannot demand that intellectuals be perfect, but they must be brave and humanist. Abbe Pierre was a good example.
I sincerely hope Taiwanese intellectuals can gather the courage to carry out their ideals. I believe that they have cognitive ability that they could use if they wanted to. Their abilities should not be obstructed by a lack of openmindness. They have the potential to fight for mankind with a critical mind.
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement