Mainland Affairs Council Vice Chairman Johnnason Liu (
It is no secret that many Web sites containing information Beijing considers "sensitive" are blocked from public access. Virtually all Web sites run by Taiwanese media outlets, as well as those that sell books and magazines, are declared off-limits. Indeed, Taiwan Yahoo's Internet Web site is blocked within China. It goes without saying that all Taiwanese government Web sites are inaccessible to the Chinese public.
The purpose is obviously to keep the Chinese from learning about news and information on Taiwan that could highlight their differences and incite social discontent and unrest. Frankly speaking, the Chinese government's fear of the potential impact of granting a free flow of information is not without basis.
Consider the case of the public's reaction to the arrest of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Contrast this to China, where corruption among high-ranking government officials and their family members is rampant and has become a major cause of social unrest. It would be unimaginable that the immediate family of a top official like Chen could be subjected to the same impartial treatment by the law and judiciary in China.
Fearing that the event would showcase the difference in Taiwan's and China's political and judiciary systems, Beijing has kept mum on Chao's case and eventual conviction early this year in Taiwan.
Despite Beijing's efforts, it has become virtually impossible to stop the free flow of information on the Internet. Even if the Chinese government manages to block some key Web sites, it cannot monitor and block out all Web sites which may contain "sensitive" information. Neither can it stop international coverage of key events in Taiwan which end up in foreign media Web sites.
As interaction between peoples from both sides of the Taiwan Strait increases, information continues to be exchanged -- be it through verbal communication or the print media. Add in all the Internet chat rooms where people can post news stories and publish their thoughts on these stories.
Blocking "sensitive" information is not the solution to maintaining social and political stability. Rather, Beijing should commit itself to reform to give the public hope that China could also follow in the footsteps of Taiwan and become democratized.
Political, social and economic reforms are urgent tasks for the Chinese government. With the free flow of information, the Chinese public, especially peole in rural areas, have increasingly become aware of the social and economic inequality that exists in China, and between it and the rest of the world. How can this gap be closed? That is the question Beijing needs to address.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS