President Chen Shui-Bian's (
The next legislative election is scheduled for December and in March next year Taiwan will choose a new president.
However, a joint election is being discussed.
The US and Chinese reactions to Chen's speech, as well as the reactions in Taiwan, were varied, as one would expect.
China complained about the rhetorical separation and reminded the US to honor a "one China" policy.
The US government did so, but experts' reactions ranged from pleased to alarmed.
In Taiwan, some said the speech was nothing new, while others called it a catastrophe.
At the same time, Washington will no doubt be watching the forthcoming elections in Taiwan.
CHANGES
The US seems to be more interested in keeping an eye on possible changes to Taiwan's Constitution than on the differences between the two main political parties.
Making changes to the Constitution is difficult.
China's interest in taking over Taiwan makes changes to the country's Constitution even more difficult.
From the US standpoint, and given past experience, not to maintain continuous discussions on this issue is not prudent.
What is lacking is a regular bilateral dialogue at an appropriate level.
What can these three interested parties -- the US, China and Taiwan's own people -- expect to hear about the coming elections?
A new system is going to be implemented in the legislature,leading to a halving of the number of legislators.
An important factor will be how each side finances election campaigns.
In the past the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) large assets have played a key role and could play a key role again.
The past eight years have shown that having the majority in the legislature is perhaps an even more important source of power than controlling the executive branch.
The KMT has been able in the legislature to block matters such oversight by the Control Yuan, for example.
At the same time, the president does not have the power to veto a bill.
The two major parties should over the next few months be determining a candidate for next year's presidential election.
The KMT seems poised to choose popular party Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
It seems to be moving toward settling internal differences within the party, which is not an easy task.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is in a less predictable situation.
There are four likely DPP candidates, but like the KMT, the party is dealing internally with ideological differences.
While Taiwan is preparing itself for legislative and presidential elections, China, on the other hand, will not only be occupied with its economy and the forthcoming Olympics, it will also be busy working on its international relations.
US experts should be considering what might lead to changes in priorities in its relationship with Taiwan.
The platforms of the DPP and the KMT ahead of next year's presidential election are still undecided.
Often, election platforms change even once they have been decided upon and publicized.
In the 2004 election, for example, the KMT changed its stance on several issues to take positions that originally had been considered unacceptable by the public.
From the US perspective, the differences between the DPP and KMT are various and important.
CROSS-STRAIT RELATIONS
As regards cross-strait relations, the DPP will focus on balancing the economic needs for its businesses in China, while preventing ties with China from overwhelming the economy.
It will also strive to get official recognition of Taiwan at international bodies.
The KMT wants to see a much closer economic relationship with China in hopes of boosting Taiwan's economy.
It is willing to draw much closer to China on many other issues as well.
It sees becoming a part of China at some time in the future as a goal.
SECURITY
Regarding security issues, the DPP leadership has not been able to establish sufficient influence to steer military defense policies in the direction it desires and gain the support of the public on security matters.
The KMT, on the other hand has deliberately weakened Taiwan's defense to gain political power and establish its own relationship with China.
The US must consider the differences between the two sides and the relationship not only with Taiwan but also with China.
In addition, the US must think about the long-term effects of its policies.
One example is US efforts to encourage Taiwan to increase its economic ties with China, while at the same time pressing Taiwan to increase its purchases of military arms and technology from the US.
Based on the statements of the two parties at this time, what can the US expect in the future? What is best for the US?
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and is now a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS