Instead of serving as a catalyst for change in how businesses and banks are regulated, the Rebar Group scandal has turned into yet another bout of self mutilation for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
After the resignation of Financial Supervisory Commission Chairman Shih Jun-ji (
But why should Su step down to take responsibility for the actions of a crooked businessman? And what can the Cabinet do to prevent corrupt individuals from secretly embezzling funds and fleeing the country? To date, no one has come up with an answer for either of these questions.
In their clamor to find a fall guy, people have overlooked the fact that the swift action taken by Su and his Cabinet brought an immediate end to any adverse effects the scandal was having on investor confidence and the nation's financial markets.
And thankfully, all the speculation about Su's future was deflated on Sunday when the president gave the premier his full backing.
So where did the hullabaloo about the premier stepping down originate?
It stemmed largely from two sources. First, the pro-China pan-blue media, which circle like vultures waiting for the slightest hint of a problem, ready to discredit the government, criticize politicians and demand their resignations. They are almost too ravenous in their hunger to peck at Su, the person viewed by the opposition as the DPP's strongest candidate for the 2008 presidential election.
The effectiveness of these organizations in shaping the direction of local news cannot be underestimated. This has been exemplified by the way the focus has quickly been diverted onto the government and who should go rather than the systemic flaws that allowed the scandal to happen and the illegal behavior of Rebar Group founder Wang You-theng (
But the second and by far the largest culprit is the DPP itself, with party infighting at the root of the whole episode.
Despite passing a resolution last July aimed at dissolving the party's many factions, internal rivalries still exist and it is these that are aiding the opposition in working to topple Su.
It goes without saying that members of the former Welfare State Faction and supporters of former Kaohsiung mayor Frank Hsieh (
But Su is a strong character and the latest rumors are like water off a duck's back. However, the individuals who started such rumors and untruths should be aware that their gossip-mongering is damaging the party.
The DPP has endured a torrid time in the media since assuming power, with various corruption cases and scandals making the headlines. The party's standing and image as an alternative to the previous regime has taken a hit in the minds of the electorate. More bad press will only cause more harm to the party.
What the DPP needs in the run up to next year's presidential election is a period of stability.
But as long as the big four -- Su, Hsieh, Vice President Annette Lu (
If the party's leaders had any clue, they would put an end to all this and choose a candidate for 2008 as soon as possible before the party does itself some serious damage.
As a person raised in a family that revered the teachings of Confucius (孔子) and Mencius (孟子), I believe that both sages would agree with Hong Kong students that people-based politics is the only legitimate way to govern China, including Hong Kong. More than two millennia ago, Confucius insisted that a leader’s first loyalty is to his people — they are water to the leader’s ship. Confucius said that the water could let the ship float only if it sailed in accordance with the will of the water. If the ship sailed against the will of the water, the ship would sink. Two
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly