The nation is struggling with financial problems and solving them should be a top priority for the government.
Welfare should always be a top priority.
Legislation must be just and disadvantaged groups must be the first priority of welfare.
But the pan-blue camp in the legislature is trying to promote "financial redistribution" by proposing legislation that would allocate NT$1.5 trillion (US$45.5 billion) to the reconstruction of old army communities.
The welfare of disadvantaged veterans should of course be a concern for the legislature. Yet the question is whether the legislation the pan-blue camp is trying to push through is a real attempt to help a disadvantaged group, or whether it unfairly prioritizes one small group in society.
To this day, workers, farmers and fishermen have not received the same level of attention from welfare policies that veterans enjoy.
This cannot continue.
The legislation would be extremely harmful to all taxpayers and the blatant unfairness of the subsidies could lead to social tensions.
The Taiwan Society urges pan-blue politicians to stop following an agenda based on partisan political interests that will increase the unfairness of privileges granted to small parts of society.
Like the debate over the reform of the 18 percent preferential savings interest rate for military personnel, civil servants and government-employed teachers, the veteran welfare issue is a product of past historical circumstances.
These issues are part of the transitional justice complex and can only be given fair and rational treatment if they are considered within that context.
Some veterans are disadvantaged and some are privileged. The welfare of disadvantaged veterans should be considered and handled within the government's general welfare system for all disadvantaged groups.
In other words, the question of who is disadvantaged should be determined based on social class.
This is clearly a matter of transitional justice.
The pan-blue camp first created a problem and then tried to pass legislation to serve its own interests, while ignoring the demands posed by transitional justice.
This is unfair both to veterans and Mainlanders and shows a blatant disregard for the nation's financial situation and the welfare of the general public.
Similar incidents have shown that Taiwanese society does not care about transitional justice. Moreover, it still has to show concern even for a fundamental transition from the past.
The Taiwan Society calls on people from all sectors of society to work together to monitor both the governing and opposition camps and to work to promote transitional justice.
The pan-blue camp decision to push for this legislation also smacks of a politics of hatred.
Simply put, the opposition is using an astronomical sum as bait to raise the expectations of veterans.
The pan-blue camp knows that if these expectations are not met, the resulting disappointment will be blamed on the pan-green camp.
It knows this will foster bitterness against the pan-green government.
This would create what the pan-blue camp sees as unwavering, loyal supporters.
This kind of deceptive, selfish politicking shows a disregard for the nation's financial situation and the welfare of the general public.
The Taiwan Society calls on veterans to behave honorably and refuse to become the vehicle of an attempt to foster anger.
Stop the manipulative politicians behind legislation that would spend tax money unfairly.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS