As the year draws to an end, it is clear that bad consumer loans were among the most important problems that the banking sector faced. Industry consolidation cases and corporate default probes will also be remembered as issues over which no small amount of ink was spilled.
Instead of contributing to the nation's economy, the banking sector may actually have dented it. So much so that rumors circulated that some banks planned to drop their year-end parties due to increasing debt and dropping revenues.
After learning that some overstretched borrowers had committed suicide because of their large credit card or cash card debts, banks and the Financial Supervisory Commission initiated in April a card-debt negotiation mechanism for cardholders which allowed flexible pricing on debt payback and other beneficial conditions for unemployed debtors and low-income debtors.
For a while, as banks strengthened their risk management procedures and borrowers learned how to use the various credit reimbursement tools at their disposal, the problem seemed to have come under control. The commission's latest data shows that the number of credit cards in circulation dropped 14.75 percent from a year ago to 39 million cards in October. The number of cash cards fell to 2.3 million in October, down 37.33 percent from a year ago.
Stock of credit card debt declined by 25.39 percent year-on-year to NT$367.8 billion (US$11.29 billion) for credit card usage, while total cash card debt shrank by 28.12 percent to NT$193.9 billion from a year earlier.
Some said the consumer credit crisis could, at the earliest, bottom out in the second quarter of next year. But whether the sector will start to show healthy growth in the coming year will depend on key consumer debt legislation which will be reviewed by lawmakers this week.
Late last year, lawmakers managed to pass a bill to cap the maximum lending rates on consumer loans, but stopped short of pushing forward with a third reading of the proposal after academics and investors said that it represented a step backward in the nation's financial liberalization.
This week, three versions of the proposed personal bankruptcy legislation are expected to be brought to a vote in the legislature. These drafts -- including a consumer debt resolution act drafted by the Judicial Yuan -- will remind us once again of the importance of seeking a balance between helping individuals who cannot repay their personal debt and must therefore seek bankruptcy protection and ensuring the banking sector's stability and long-term competitiveness.
Taking the draft legislation's impact on society, the economy and the nation's reputation into full account, the joint banking committee of the American and European Chambers of Commerce earlier this year warned that proper conditions, limits and safeguards must be adopted to prevent a possible "moral hazard" situation where some debtors may try to avoid paybacks through the projected personal bankruptcy legislation.
These conditions, limits and safeguards -- such as proper safeguards against possible abuse and independent debt counseling for bankruptcy seekers -- will amount to nothing if they are not seen as an instrument of last resort.
To establish the nation's first consumer insolvency regime, lawmakers will need to approach the legislation with care. As for credit abusers, some limits should be made on their lifestyles and measures taken against overspending.
There is no such thing as a free lunch. Ultimately, debtors have to pay.
During the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum’s third leadership summit on Aug. 31, US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun said that the US wants to partner with the other members of the Quadrilaterial Security Dialogue — Australia, India and Japan — to establish an organization similar to NATO, to “respond to ... any potential challenge from China.” He said that the US’ purpose is to work with these nations and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to “create a critical mass around the shared values and interest of those parties,” and possibly attract more countries to establish an alliance comparable to
On August 24, 2020, the US Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, made an important statement: “The Pentagon is Prepared for China.” Going forward, how might the Department of Defense team up with Taiwan to make itself even more prepared? No American wants to deter the next war by a paper-thin margin, and no one appreciates the value of strategic overmatch more than the war planners at the Pentagon. When the stakes are this high, you can bet they want to be super ready. In recent months, we have witnessed a veritable flood of high-level statements from US government leaders on
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new