The past six years have seen a period of rapid political change. The nation's first transfer of power occurred after the 2000 presidential election, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lost power after being the ruling party for half a century.
That election dislodged a group of officials who believed they were entitled to a lifelong tenure in the government. After losing power, they have engaged in constant political struggle.
During the past two years, the nation has experienced a dark period in which the media has effecttively ruled the country. Sensationalist media outlets and ambitious politicians joined forces to launch irresponsible accusations, groundless and unproven "revelations," and personal attacks on officials. This has created a virtual "society of opposition," in which groups have become enemies.
The media barrage has painted a sad picture of the country. The reality, however, is that most people are down-to-earth and hard-working and the nation's overall development is gradually heading in the right direction.
But after the Taipei and Kaohsiung mayoral elections, this atmosphere of unease should begin to fade away. The election results clearly show that society's most urgent desire is for political stability. Voters expect politicians' statements and actions to be consistent and to represent the interests of the public.
Politicians should listen to the public's desire for stability as expressed through the vote. Taiwanese want politicians to call an end to power struggles and obey the absolute democratic principle that minority parties must accept majority rule.
Taiwanese are not interested in the extreme positions of the two political camps, as evidenced by the gradual shrinking of support for the KMT and the growing inability of the Democratic Progressive Party to push reform.
Politicians must remember that voters do not want them to abuse power. Society expects its elected officials to put effective social, educational and economic policies into effect.
The neutral political force that is forming in Taiwan is like the light at the end of a dark tunnel. It gives Taiwan a chance to improve its political situation and improve its position in the world.
James Chan is a professor in the College of Public Health at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big