Commentators often like to compare things here with the situation in "advanced" countries around the world when trying to make a point about how "backward" a certain practice is or how "immature" democratic institutions are.
But a couple of events that occurred in the UK last week demonstrate that we have less to worry about than most people think.
Last Thursday was an embarrassing day for the British government. First, Lord Goldsmith, the attorney general for England and Wales, announced a decision to end an investigation by the British police's Serious Fraud Office into alleged bribes paid to Saudi officials as part of an arms deal in the 1980s.
The British press said that the decision to halt the proceedings was in response to economic threats from the Saudi regime, as investigators were close to discovering the identities of those who received the kickbacks. The reason given by Goldsmith, however, was that the investigation was dropped because of "national security" interests, with the shocking admission that "the wider public interest" outweighed "the need to maintain the rule of law."
The British government could still find itself in hot water, however, as it is a signatory to the 1999 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Anti-Bribery Convention, which states that probes should not be "influenced by considerations of national economic interest, the potential effect upon relations with another state or the identity of the natural or legal persons involved."
The decision brought comparisons to a "banana republic" in the British press.
On the same day, it was revealed that British Prime Minister Tony Blair had been questioned by police investigating allegations of "cash for peerages." Officers were gathering evidence as part of a probe into whether the Labour Party had broken existing laws in accepting cash loans from several businessmen in exchange for titles and places in parliament's upper house.
Although he is the leader of the Labour Party, Blair was not cautioned before the interview, a key fact as it means the police have no reason to believe any charges will be brought against him in future.
These events are worth mentioning as they bear a striking similarity to two ongoing issues in Taiwan, namely the investigation into bribes paid during the purchase of six Lafayette-class frigates in the 1990s and the indictment of first lady Wu Shu-jen (
The bid to find out the truth about the huge kickbacks given as part of the Lafayette deal began in 2001, but efforts in France to uncover evidence have stalled because of the French government's refusal to give magistrates access to top-secret defense files that identify the recipients.
Although motivated partly by partisan interests, the Democratic Progressive Party's efforts to investigate this corrupt deal must be commended; it is a shame that prosecutors have been thwarted in their efforts by foreign governments, in much the same way as the British police have been.
The "state affairs fund" probe, on the other hand, demonstrates just how far Taiwan has come in a short time. There is an element of partisanship involved in the Wu case, but hopefully it will set a precedent for future leaders.
The fact that the first lady and other high-level officials are on trial for abusing their position and that the president has also been implicated goes to show that very few, if any, are above the law. Unfortunately, from what has transpired in Britain over the last week, it seems that the same cannot be said of some so-called "advanced" states.
On this score, Taiwan deserves some praise.
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
US president-elect Donald Trump is inheriting from President Joe Biden a challenging situation for American policy in the Indo-Pacific region, with an expansionist China on the march and threatening to incorporate Taiwan, by force if necessary. US policy choices have become increasingly difficult, in part because Biden’s policy of engagement with China, including investing in personal diplomacy with President Xi Jinping (習近平), has not only yielded little but also allowed the Chinese military to gain a stronger footing in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. In Xi’s Nov. 16 Lima meeting with a diminished Biden, the Chinese strongman signaled little