US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson went to China with a team of heavyweights, including an array of Bush administration Cabinet members and the Federal Reserve chairman.
But he is returning home to a more critical audience that is unlikely to be satisfied with the inconclusive results he achieved in opening a new economic dialogue with Beijing.
The problem is that Paulson faces a growing number of lawmakers -- and behind them powerful but divided business constituencies, along with a politically energized labor movement -- who are not counseling patience right now, especially after an election where China-bashing was a bipartisan sport.
While no members of Congress were actually in Beijing, they might as well have been sitting at the rows of tables at the Great Hall of the People, surrounded by red, gold and green decor and even more ornate rhetoric. The anti-trade sentiment in Congress lurked over the meeting, and certainly was felt by the Chinese.
One sign that the US delegation was playing to an audience both in China and in the US came in the speech delivered by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Friday to the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, in which he made a strong case for China to let the value of its currency rise against the dollar.
Bernanke's advanced text, replete with 22 footnotes, called China's undervalued currency an "effective subsidy" of exports. In the end, though, he omitted that term, taking a more diplomatic approach, possibly because the term might feed protectionist sentiments on Capitol Hill while ruffling more feathers among the Chinese.
Paulson, in an interview before leaving on Friday, acknowledged that the Chinese were motivated to act out of fear of retaliation by US lawmakers, who charge that inexpensive Chinese goods have cost jobs and forced the country to borrow US$700 billion from China to finance its import addiction.
"The way I've articulated the situation to the Chinese is to look beyond Congress," Paulson said. "Congress is a reflection of the American public, and the American public has a perception that the benefits of trade between our two countries aren't being shared equally or fairly."
Paulson said it was not realistic to expect the dialogue, which he began in September, to produce concrete results this quickly.
But, he added that "the American people are rightfully going to demand that we show tangible results along the way."
Some already are.
The US Business and Industry Council, which represents some 1,500 small and medium manufacturers and generally opposes free trade initiatives, said in a statement that Paulson and his high-level delegation had engaged in "chit-chat diplomacy."
It called the meetings "yet another meaningless mission to China -- one that accomplished nothing while domestic manufacturers and other US businesses continue to be victimized by Beijing's predatory trade practices."
Part of the frustration among business groups and lawmakers is that Paulson, by the mere fact that he was accompanied by several Cabinet members and Bernanke, may have raised expectations that he would bring home more concrete results. Instead, the meeting wound up on Friday with an agreement to set up several study groups and other pledges, but only atmospherics to suggest that China might eventually stop undervaluing its currency to promote exports.
Paulson said the currency issue was a "core concern" and would take time to resolve. But for China it was Congress that was a core concern.
That was obvious from the pointed comments of Wu Yi (
"I think both sides know that it is not good politically for Paulson to go back empty handed," said Jin Canrong (金燦榮), a professor of international studies at Renmin University in Beijing. "China can also see that Paulson is concerned about the incoming Democrats on this issue. He has very actively delivered this message of concern."
Another session of the dialogue, also with many Cabinet members on both sides, was scheduled for May in Washington, where it is certain that members of Congress will participate in some form, if not directly in the talks.
As for Bernanke, his lecture was a powerful though perhaps esoteric argument for noneconomists that is likely to be closely studied by Chinese officials.
The Federal Reserve chairman explained that, to keep the currency undervalued, China has to buy dollars to prop up their price. Buying dollars means exchanging them for Chinese currency, flooding China with an abundance of yuan.
The yuan glut would normally fuel inflation, he said, so China sells bonds to Chinese owners of yuan to take them out of circulation in a process known as "sterilization." Bernanke told the Chinese that can only work so long.
China's desperate need to keep its currency low to support its export drive, meanwhile, forces it to keep interest rates artificially low as well. The result is that China's central bank is unable to use monetary policy to manage its economy.
Artificially low interest rates have another downside: When Chinese bureaucrats make loans for political objectives, mainly to money-losing state enterprises layered with Communist Party bureaucrats, the interest rates they charge cannot reflect the risk involved or the market value of investments, as they do in the West.
It all boiled down to Bernanke telling the Chinese that they cannot have a sound market economy and also an artificially low currency value.
Paulson, treating Bernanke as his new best friend, called it a great speech that offered "a whole new dimension" to the US arguments.
Some in the Bush administration think China is going through an internal struggle, and that forces favoring a free-floating currency are taking baby steps to get there, by letting the yuan rise ever so gradually to avoid touching off a panic, in hopes of persuading leaders of the export-driven economy that they can adjust to it over time.
Whether Congress can be convinced of that point of view is Paulson's main challenge, along with negotiating cuts in the federal budget and savings in Social Security and Medicare to make good on his pledge in Beijing to do something about the US' low savings rate.
The key to whether Congress proves willing to give Paulson more time lies, in the administration's view, with the business groups the members listen to.
That is why the Treasury chief met with the US Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers and leaders of Fortune 50 companies before he went to China. He plans to meet with them again when he gets back. If they see currency moving in the right direction, they may be more patient.
But without concrete evidence that the bilateral trade imbalance between China and the US has started to shrink, Paulson's aides concede, he does not have too much time before congressional pressure leads to bills imposing tariffs or other sanctions on China.
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
US president-elect Donald Trump is inheriting from President Joe Biden a challenging situation for American policy in the Indo-Pacific region, with an expansionist China on the march and threatening to incorporate Taiwan, by force if necessary. US policy choices have become increasingly difficult, in part because Biden’s policy of engagement with China, including investing in personal diplomacy with President Xi Jinping (習近平), has not only yielded little but also allowed the Chinese military to gain a stronger footing in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. In Xi’s Nov. 16 Lima meeting with a diminished Biden, the Chinese strongman signaled little
On Tuesday, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) issued a statement criticizing Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a student from Shanghai’s Fudan University, saying she had offended the sensibilities of Taiwanese. It also called for the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation — established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — which had organized the tour group, to remind group members to be careful with their statements. Song, during a visit to a baseball stadium in Taichung, said that the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team (中國台北隊) ... we wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
RSS