Fed up with government inaction on the hot-button issue of illegal immigration, a growing number of US towns are taking matters into their own hands adopting controversial and, some say, illegal legislation.
From making English the official language of local government to banning foreign flags, more than 30 cities or municipalities across the country in recent months have adopted measures designed to be anti-immigrant.
Laws
Many have also passed laws banning landlords from renting to undocumented immigrants and penalizing local businesses that hire illegals.
Observers say such measures reflect a growing sense of frustration with the federal government's ongoing debate on how to deal with the country's estimated 11 million illegal immigrants, most of them from Mexico and Central America.
"In most cases, these local changes to the law or ordinances that are trying to be passed represent communities first of all dealing with an influx of immigration," Audrey Singer, an expert on immigration trends with the Brookings Institution, an independent Washington think tank, said.
"Secondly the leadership in those places are frustrated by the federal government and so they are taking immigration law in their own hands," she said.
Nationwide
Singer also noted that whereas 10 years ago the issue of illegal immigration involved only a few states, it has now become a nationwide concern as immigrants, mostly Hispanics, have spread across the country.
"The newness of the phenomenon and, in some cases, the growth has been very fast," Singer said. "So local leadership in some cases embrace immigrants and accommodate them and in some cases work toward deflecting them elsewhere."
Flags
In Pahrump, a desert outpost in the western state of Nevada with a growing immigrant population, the local council last month voted an English-only ordinance along with a measure barring residents from flying a foreign flag unless it is placed below an American flag. Violators face a US$50 fine and 30 hours of community service.
In Hazleton, an industrial city in the northeast state of Pennsylvania, local authorities justified the adoption of a tough anti-immigrant ordinance by arguing that illegals contribute to an increase in crime and failing schools, and are a burden to the city's resources.
Racism
Rob Toonkel, spokeswoman for US English, a group that promotes the use of the English language in government that has helped several towns draw up ordinances to that effect, said such measures have nothing to do with racism.
"Official English legislation as written has nothing to do with criticizing immigrants in any way," Toonkel said. "What it says is `you can't walk into a government office and demand service in a language other than English.'"
But critics fear such measures will eventually lead to a general backlash against legal immigrants or anyone who looks different or even speaks with an accent.
Discrimination
"They almost represent kind of a green light for discrimination against immigrants generally and against US citizens who may appear to be foreign," Omar Jadwat said.
Jadwat is an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, which has filed lawsuits against the ordinances in many cities, including Hazleton, on grounds they are unconstitutional.
"The practicalities of how these ordinances work tend to encourage people to discriminate generally against folks who look foreign regardless of their immigration status," Jadwat said.
Reaction
William Ramos, director of the Washington office of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials, said the measures which are designed to be anti-immigrant are more a knee-jerk reaction than a thoughtful response to community problems.
"Whichever it is, I certainly hope that folks can be enlightened quickly enough to understand that these 11 million Latinos who are undocumented are not necessarily going anywhere, anytime soon," he said.
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in