At a recent birthday dinner for former presidential advisor Koo Kwang-ming (
Although the response was not warm, political leaders in and outside of Taiwan are all carefully awaiting Chen's next move because of his success in pushing for a referendum law as well as a constitutional amendment enshrining the institution of the referendum in the Constitution. He also overcame the restrictions inherent in his "four noes" to freeze the National Unification Council and national unification guidelines.
In addition, the North Korean nuclear test and the resulting tensions in East Asia create an international environment conducive to Taiwan's adopting a new constitution, because Pyongyang's threat means the US is likely to need Taiwan more than ever before.
At the same time, constititional topics accentuate the main difference between the pan-blue and pan-green's political stances. The pan-blues are clearly intent on ousting Chen and incriminating his family. The pan-greens have spotlighted institutional reform. In the past they pushed for direct election of the president and the right to elect the entire legislature, and now their focus includes the Constitution and referendums. All these topics revolve around institutional changes.
Former president Lee Teng-hui's (
The media and pan-blues largely brushed off the discussion on the Second Republic, and conspiritorial analyses abound. Very few discussions mention the necessity and urgency of the Second Republic concept to the nation. In the past, the pan-blue camp has had exactly the same hesitant reaction to referendums and constitutional reform.
Now the pan-blue camp's attitude could become even more conservative in consideration of KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (
All political parties should take surveys to see how voters feel about constitutional reform after suffering through so much partisan conflict.
More importantly, the concept of a "Second Republic" could both extend the Republic of China and offer a clean break from the Constitution. It offers an ingenious way of getting around the framework set by the "four noes" pledge and satisfy the need for a new constitution for Taiwan.
In particular, this would be in the same spirit as Chen's decision to "freeze" the unification guidelines instead of abolish them. Using an explanatory foreword to maintain the symbolic status of the guidelines didn't violate the "four noes" pledge, but it still indirectly broke through the limits imposed by Chen's promise.
It doesn't matter how much the Constitution is amended. Abolishing the previous amendments and returning to the original version could be considered a "second constitution."
In response to the proposal for this "second constitution" -- which is designed for the benefit of Taiwan, and which seeks to give the Constitution an appropriate use and form and make it pertinent to the present -- perhaps Ma and the pan-blue politicians should take a minute to think before mocking it.
The KMT is the biggest opposition party. If it makes people feel that it is only concerned with bringing down Chen and making Premier Su Tseng-chang (
Hsu Yung-ming is an assistant research fellow at the Sun Yat-sen Institute for Social Sciences and Philosophy at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Jason Cox and Marc Langer
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS