In a number of countries recently, disputed elections or allegations of corrupt government led to "people power" sweeping down the streets and setting themselves up as judges. Encouraged by the media, they want to see their claims vindicated by deposing the "bad guy."
Taiwan's "red tide" wants to depose the president because he is supposedly corrupt. In this case, we see appeals being made to "people power": gimmicks such as parades in red combat dress, flash mobs and soft strikes have absorbed time and energy -- even the precious life of a policeman who was on duty.
Most people realize that deposing the president won't make the rest of the bureaucratic pyramid change overnight. The same problems of corruption will re-appear. Unfortunately, however, we find that those people in the "red tide" don't understand that deposing a president can't solve these problems. It seems they have lost their minds.
The make-believe process is easy to track: a leading actor, in colors fit for a fashion parade, uses exaggerated, repetitive and entertaining methods to give participants the impression that they constitute "people power" and can storm a new Bastille. Caught up in this fictitious revolution, they act without proper judgment and become pliant followers.
"People power" is too precious to be wasted like this. If the resources that drive "people power" can be better connected to the development of this country and its society, then it could constitute a tremendous force and lead to great achievements. But if the power is misused, under certain circumstances it could lead to unexpected trouble and even catastrophe.
So, the public must decide the circumstances in which "people power" will be used. They must also be aware of the importance and influence of this power.
Its potential derives from a consensus of the following pillars of a democratic society: One must be humanist, with the group having preference over self-interest; one must be humble; and one must be humorous -- choosing a peaceful, joyful and harmonious way of helping society move forward.
If "people power" relies on a figurehead, then this means that participants are not humanist, humble or humorous. If Shih Ming-teh really is humanist and humble, then he should end his self-gratifying role as lead actor and choose more harmonious ways to help Taiwanese.
Sylvie Allassonniere
Taipei
A brickbat over brides
I have a problem with the article "Baoshan foreign brides bake moon cakes for elderly"(Oct. 7, page 2).
In the second paragraph, the reporter writes: "The women, all immigrants from Vietnam and Indonesia, said that they remembered how lonely they felt when they first arrived in Taiwan and couldn't speak the language, so they decided that they wanted to do something for people feeling lonely over the Mid-Autumn Festival."
To adopt such a view, the reporter must have a disgraceful view about all women immigrants, especially from Vietnam and Indonesia.
In Taiwan, I have found that most women coming from these countries are having an unpleasant experience in Taiwan in terms of social status.
They have been treated unfairly in terms of work placement. Some even have to work extra hours without pay.
These women lack legal protection during their time in Taiwan, and I hope that the next time this reporter writes about female immigrants, especially from Southeast Asian countries, your editor will do a thorough job on it because this kind of news will have a serious impact on how Taiwanese behave toward immigrants and on the relationship between Taiwan and Southeast Asian countries in particular.
Wen Min
Taipei
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
In A phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Xi is reported to have stated that in his view, “Taiwan’s return to China” is to be considered an integral part of the post-World War II international order. Never mind that China under Xi has been trying to undermine the liberal post-war international order by setting up alternative organizations and schemes that are detrimental to freedom and democracy around the world. Its own repression of Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong are vivid examples. The “return to China” is the biggest misnomer: Taiwan has never ever been part
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman
RSS