Late in the San Francisco Peace Conference that negotiated the treaty ending World War II in the Pacific, former Japanese prime minister Shigeru Yoshida rose to say that his nation accepted "this fair and generous treaty."
Then he launched into the first prominent apology for Japan's aggression of 1931 to 1945, saying: "We have listened here to the delegates who have recalled the terrible human suffering, and the great material destruction of the late war in the Pacific. It is with feelings of sorrow that we recall the part played in that catastrophic human experience by the old Japan."
"I speak of the old Japan," Yoshida said, "because out of the ashes of the old Japan there has risen a new Japan."
That was in September 1951. From that day to this, Japanese leaders have repeatedly expressed regret, sorrow, remorse and apology for that unhappy period.
Somehow, however, they have been unable to get those apologies accepted by other people, notably the Chinese and Koreans. Moreover, allegations that Japan has never apologized have intensified recently.
Japan's new prime minister, Shinzo Abe, who is scheduled to visit China and South Korea today and tomorrow, may be confronted with this issue sooner than he might have liked. Unless he resolves it, he will be unable to achieve the aims laid out in his inaugural speech to the Diet, particularly in wanting Japan to be "a country that is trusted, respected and loved in the world, and which demonstrates leadership."
As the New York Times said in a recent editorial: "An ugly, but increasingly distant, history of Japanese aggression and war crimes stands in the way ... Mr Abe needs to extricate Japan from this destructive dynamic."
Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, lists 40 occasions on which a Japanese emperor, prime minister, or other leader has expressed remorse for Japan's wartime behavior. Wikipedia cited the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, press conferences, Diet records, transcripts of meetings with Chinese and Korean leaders, a Tokyo University database and records from the prime minister's office.
Perhaps the most important of those apologies was that rendered by former prime minister Tomiichi Murayama in 1995 on the 50th anniversary of Japan's surrender. He pointed to what he called the "irrefutable facts of history" and expressed "my feelings of deep remorse and state my heartfelt apology."
That statement, which was approved unanimously by the Cabinet, became the government's official position. Critics before and after have asserted that other apologies were merely personal expressions. Later, former prime minister Ryutaro Hashimoto and former foreign minister Yohei Kono asserted that this had been an official statement.
Japan, however, has not so far gotten these apologies across, for two reasons.
One is Japanese ineptitude in communicating with the outside world. The second is that China and South Korea have used the issue to extract diplomatic and economic concessions from Japan -- North Korea is incorrigible on this question and can be ignored.
Too many Japanese apologies have seemed grudging, weak, or diluted by being slipped out amid other statements. With the exception of Murayama's "heartfelt apology," few appear to have had the force of a forthright statement.
However, former prime minister Junichiro Koizumi echoed Murayama at an Asia-African summit meeting in Indonesia last year only to have his apology brushed off by China.
A Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, Kong Quan (
Abe, the first truly postwar prime minister, has an opportunity now to resolve this issue once and for all. In doing so, he could seek the approval and support of Emperor Akihito, the only one who has the moral and constitutional authority to speak for all of Japan.
This highly visible closure would comprise three elements: a strong, clear and final apology by the emperor; an equally strong, clear and final resolution by the Diet and Cabinet; and a foreign ministry account of all Japanese apologies, beginning with that of Yoshida in 1951.
This publication, in Japanese, English, Chinese and Korean, would state that this was the final Japanese expression of remorse and that this issue was now closed.
It would be essential to try to obtain Chinese and South Korean prior acceptance of the apologies, without reservation. That could be ascertained through diplomatic channels. If Beijing and Seoul refuse, Japan would make that known and still take the moral high ground.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
RSS