North Korea's brinkmanship will intensify a debate in Japan about developing atomic weapons, a long-standing taboo in the only nation to have suffered nuclear attack, analysts said.
Both the US and South Korea predicted in official statements or reports that North Korea's plans to test a nuclear bomb will build momentum in Japan to do likewise.
North Korea said on Tuesday it would carry out the test to win concessions from the US, but ironically the move also emboldened Japanese hardliners who want to shed some of the pacifism imposed after defeat in World War II.
"I can't reject the possibility that a nuclear deterrent system would be developed in the region," said Yoshinobu Yamamoto, a professor of international politics at Aoyama Gakuin University.
He envisioned in one scenario that Japan may move to create a nuclear deterrent in East Asia through cooperation with the US.
"Even if the North's missiles do not reach the United States, they could easily put Japan in the firing range and destroy it," he said. "By bolstering the US nuclear umbrella and having Japan in between, it's possible to develop the double deterrent system."
Japan is already believed to be capable of assembling nuclear weapons if it makes the political decision. But more realistically, Yamamoto said Japan might let the US military bring nuclear weapons to its bases in the country. Either move would be a drastic change of policy for Japan, where more than 210,000 people were killed in the 1945 US atomic bombings that flattened Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
New Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has not called for Japan's nuclearization but supports a wider military role including revising the US-written 1947 pacifist Constitution.
The rise of Abe shows the growing willingness of policy makers to think in new ways on military issues, analysts said.
"Those hardliners are speaking on Japan's nuclearization without even facing criticism anymore," said Akira Kato, a professor of political science at Obirin University.
Former prime minister Eisaku Sato proposed developing nuclear weapons in the 1960s as China built the bomb. But his position was rejected by the US.
More recently, a magazine this year quoted Foreign Minister Taro Aso as telling US Vice President Dick Cheney that Japan would need atomic weapons if North Korea pursued a nuclear program. Aso's aides denied the report.
Japan already has a de facto military and most Japanese support revising the Constitution. But the country is sharply divided on how far to deviate from official pacifism.
South Korean Vice Foreign Minister Yu Myung-hwan has warned that North Korea could push Japan into developing nuclear weapons.
"That may provide an excuse for Japan's nuclear armament, which in turn will cause repercussions from China and Russia and lead to a change in the overall balance of power," Yu said last Wednesday.
But many analysts remained skeptical that nuclear weapons would be on Japan's political agenda anytime soon.
"Some people will start discussing the matter actively," said Masao Okonogi, Keio University professor of North Korean studies. "But I don't think their argument would become the mainstream."
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
RSS