North Korea may have hoped to intimidate Japan's new Prime Minister Shinzo Abe by pledging a nuclear test, but wound up playing into his hands, analysts said.
Abe, who took office last week, faced his first crisis as he prepared to head to China and South Korea on a breakthrough tour to repair tense relations.
North Korea may have wanted to drive a fresh wedge between Japan and neighboring countries, which have taken a softer approach to Pyongyang, but its saber-rattling will also vindicate Abe at home, analysts said.
Abe, 52, rose to prominence through his tough talk on North Korea. He has an unabashedly conservative agenda that includes rewriting the US-imposed 1947 pacifist Constitution.
"In many ways this will make life easier for Abe. He has always had a strong anti-North Korean position. Now he can say, `I told you so,'" said Phil Deans, a professor of international affairs at Temple University in Tokyo.
"He will be able to use this to say, look, we can't always rely on the United States. The time has come for Japan to act -- standing with its allies, but on its own feet," Deans said.
He said a North Korean nuclear test will also boost a hardline minority who believe Japan -- the only nation to suffer nuclear attack -- should acquire atomic weapons on its own.
Abe has not called for nuclear weapons. But he wants Japan to have a military in name -- not the "Self-Defense Forces" as it is now known -- which would take a larger role overseas.
His views are unpopular in Asian countries that have been invaded by Japan. But China and South Korea said on Wednesday they will host Abe next week in a bid to repair ties strained over history issues under his predecessor Junichiro Koizumi.
North Korea has now managed to steal some of the focus of Abe's diplomacy.
"It may be that his record and hostility toward North Korea has aided those in the North who wanted to take a more provocative stance, saying that now that this man is in charge there's no point to compromise," Deans said.
North Korea, in a statement on Tuesday announcing its plans, made no direct reference to Japan. Pyongyang said it would test nuclear weapons because of hostility and financial sanctions by the US.
But even if North Korea's main concern was not Japan, it provides a first test for Abe, analysts said.
Masao Okonogi, a professor of North Korean studies at Tokyo's Keio University, said the neighboring countries would shun Japanese attempts to impose further sanctions on the North.
"This weekend's summits with Beijing and Seoul will inevitably show the differences in stance on the North between Tokyo and the two Asian neighbors," Okonogi said.
Abe, speaking in parliament last Wednesday, pledged to use his upcoming visit to form a united front on North Korea.
It was a change in tone from July, when Abe -- then the top aide to Koizumi -- rattled neighboring countries by suggesting a theoretical pre-emptive attack on the communist state.
Japanese are particularly concerned as Pyongyang fired a missile over the country's main island in 1998. The test led Japan to team up with the US on missile defense and to ease its longstanding ban on weapons exports.
Robert Dujarric, a North Korea expert based in Tokyo, said the true test of Abe's intentions will be whether he seeks to step up military spending, which has declined in recent years as Japan battles a ballooning public debt.
"This will probably push Abe to be a little more aggressive verbally. But what to watch is what it does to Japan's defense," Dujarric said.
"This is good for those who are perceived as being hawkish in Japan, because the soft line of `let's negotiate with North Korea' looks weaker and weaker," he said.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US