It seems that the recent spurt of anti-corruption fervor has taken hold on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan has its Million Voices Against Corruption campaign, while China dismissed Chen Liangyu (
Although Taiwan's campaign was initiated by former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh (
Although Taiwan's anti-corruption campaign is a spontaneous civil movement, its goal is confined to achieving a change of power at the highest level of government. Given that the president's involvement in illegal activities is unproven, disregarding legal procedures and forcing Chen out of office prematurely points to the sharp rise in anti-Chen sentiment being a carryover from the March 19, 2004, shooting incident.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) also appears to be fighting corruption. Accused of misappropriating the city's social security fund, Chen Liangyu was fired and his movements restricted. On the surface it seems that the Chinese government is acting firmly and quickly. However, many see the move as part of Chinese President Hu Jintao's (
The anti-Chen campaign has dragged on for weeks, resulting in a number of street confrontations between supporters and opponents of the president. Amid a judicial investigation into Chen Shui-bian's alleged wrongdoing, certain legislators and the media have been happy to stoke the fire by disclosing unverified information relating to the president's case and urging the public to oppose him.
In China, it is the CCP's Central Committee that has the final say on who is charged and what punishments apply. The Chinese public does not have a say in the handling of corrupt officials. Unlike Taiwan, this is an authoritarian, top-down decision-making process.
The anti-corruption effort on both sides of the Strait is the same, but the process through which it is carried out is not. Despite the large number of people participating in the campaigns for or against the president, the government and the protesters have largely exercised self-restraint and refrained from escalating the conflict. This is a far cry from the way Beijing forcefully clamps down on rights activists. In Taiwan, at least, there is a silver lining to the cloud of corruption that hangs over the government.
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, entered service this week after a commissioning ceremony in China’s Hainan Province on Wednesday last week. Chinese state media reported that the Fujian would be deployed to the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the western Pacific. It seemed that the Taiwan Strait being one of its priorities meant greater military pressure on Taiwan, but it would actually put the Fujian at greater risk of being compromised. If the carrier were to leave its home port of Sanya and sail to the East China Sea or the Yellow Sea, it would have to transit the
The artificial intelligence (AI) boom, sparked by the arrival of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, took the world by storm. Within weeks, everyone was talking about it, trying it and had an opinion. It has transformed the way people live, work and think. The trend has only accelerated. The AI snowball continues to roll, growing larger and more influential across nearly every sector. Higher education has not been spared. Universities rushed to embrace this technological wave, eager to demonstrate that they are keeping up with the times. AI literacy is now presented as an essential skill, a key selling point to attract prospective students.