On SepT. 15, one of the slogans of people demonstrating against President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was "abolish immunity from criminal prosecution and return our right to recall the president."
Some anti-Chen protesters apparently still care about the Constitution.
According to Article 52 of the Constitution, "The president shall not, without being recalled or discharged, be subject to criminal prosecution unless he is charged with having committed an act of rebellion or treason." Regardless of whether accusations of Chen's corruption are true or false, such accusations fall within the scope of criminal prosecution.
As to the recall issue, a presidential recall motion was launched by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in June, but failed to achieve the required two-thirds majority. If anti-Chen protesters believe that the current majority requirement is too strict, they must wait for a constitutional amendment before they can "reclaim the right to recall the president."
Since they are willing to consider the issue and take action based on the Constitution and the rule of law, the agitation will subside naturally and there is hope of a solution. Furthermore, Taipei City is governed by KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Thus, if the pan-blue camp looks at the issue rationally, it will show restraint and prevent any violence from occurring. The mass demonstrations of Sept. 15 and Sept. 16 -- in which hundreds of thousands of protesters from both sides of the political spectrum took to the streets -- show that this analysis is correct.
Then, the next question has to be: What is necessary for the anti-Chen campaign -- ?which must come to a peaceful end -- to develop in a positive direction?
I submit the following three points for consideration.
First, and most importantly, since the campaign has realized that the "live or die" approach leads to violence, that its focus on Chen personally lacks legitimacy, and has shifted its focus to anti-corruption, it should take an honest look at the past corruption in the KMT as well as present and future legislators, regardless of political affiliation.
With a new legislative session just underway, lawmakers from both political camps should be pushed to draw up alternative versions of a "sunshine bill" so that an anti-corruption system can be established as soon as possible.
Second, the Constitution of the Republic of China was hammered out in China and is mostly irrelevant to the daily lives of the Taiwanese people.
The public generally do not have a practical understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of a presidential system versus a Cabinet system, nor do they understand the value of and restrictions to the freedoms of expression and political participation. Having experienced a transfer of political power, it should now be possible to discuss the direction of constitutional and other legal amendments based on the experience of the past decade.
Third, mass demonstrations are not necessarily a good thing for democracy. The current pro and anti-Chen demonstrations are mainly a product of TV and newspaper hype, as the media disregard journalistic professionalism and ethics to intervene directly in the political struggle, showing that Taiwan is an underdeveloped nation from a media perspective.
If Taiwan cannot reform its media, it is almost impossible that the nation will develop in a positive way.
Chen Yi-shen is an associate researcher in the Institute of Modern History at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement