After many years of celebrating the founding of the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan, this year's national day -- or Double Ten National Day -- looks like it will be marred by political protests and, perhaps ironically, by a core of pan-blue politicians who have long claimed steadfast loyalty to the ROC.
Shih Ming-teh (施明德), leader of the campaign seeking to oust President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), announced on Monday that he will lead thousands of protesters in another siege on the Presidential Office building on Double Ten day, blocking the front and rear entrances of the building to turn up the heat on Chen. He claimed that this was necessary to let the whole world know that the president must step down.
The anti-Chen protest is a PR move aimed at putting Chen on the spot as he plays host to a cohort of foreign diplomats and visitors, but the truth of the matter is that by doing this, Shih and his followers are simply bringing shame to everyone.
Taiwan already has its fair share of foreign policy difficulties. Under these circumstances, is it appropriate or acceptable to use this occasion to make a laughing stock of the nation in the international community? Is the Shih campaign's hatred toward Chen so deep that it is willing to embarrass him at the expense of the collective dignity?
This does not even mention the hint of violence that pervades the campaign -- organizers are calling it a "universal siege."
Chien Hsi-chieh, deputy head of the Shih camp, stressed that the event would be carried out in a peaceful manner. This is disingenuous: The campaign needs violence to retain the media's attention.
Will the Shih camp shoulder responsibility for such stupidity, or merely dismiss it as the "acts of a few over-enthusiastic individuals" as it did when reports of violent clashes between pro and anti-Chen protesters took place on Monday night in Kaohsiung and Tuesday night in Tainan?
The "universal siege" has gained the support of People First Party Chairman James Soong (
Double Ten day celebrates the start of the Wuchang Uprising on Oct. 10, 1911, which, under the leadership of Sun Yat-sen (
Given the Shih camp's determination to hold the "siege" on the ROC's national day, the DPP government might as well just call off the celebration altogether.
After all, what does the Wuchang Uprising have to do with Taiwan? Why celebrate an event in China that has only vague relevance for the lives of the vast majority of Taiwanese?
The ROC came into being at a time when Taiwan didn't even fall under its jurisdiction. In 1912, the nation was subject to another imperial power -- Japan. Celebrating Double Ten day here is akin to Taiwanese celebrating Thanksgiving -- it may once have been an important day in the world calender, but it's hardly ours.
Given that Shih and his followers couldn't care less about this year's national day, the public might as well take the chance to ponder when exactly Taiwan should hold its national celebration.
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman
President William Lai’s (賴清德) historic announcement on Wednesday, Nov. 26, of a supplemental defense budget valued in excess of US$40 billion is a testament to the seriousness with which Taiwan is responding to the relentless expansionist ambitions of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the Chinese Communist Party and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Lai is responding to the threat posed to Taiwan sovereignty along with US President Donald Trump’s insistence that American partners in good standing must take on more responsibility for their own defense. The supplemental defense budget will be broken into three main parts. The first and largest piece
RSS