Australia says it is not the sheriff of the South Pacific, but complaints over a rebel jailbreak in East Timor and riots in the Solomon Islands are putting its new activist foreign policy to the test.
In both countries Australia has troops or police on the ground in a peacekeeping role and in both cases it has been blamed for failures that plunged them deeper into crisis.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard has reacted angrily to the charges, but analysts said Wednesday he should expect increasing criticism as he follows through with the "Howard doctrine" of greater intervention in the region.
"This is part of growing up in foreign policy terms and you've got to cop the flak sometimes, that's just one of the costs," said Alan Dupont, a security analyst at the University of Sydney.
"One of the problems in taking a more active approach under the so-called Howard doctrine is we are going to suffer the consequences every time something goes wrong in one of these states and it's difficult to get any kudos," he said.
Howard has made it clear that he believes Australia, as the most powerful country in a region of tiny and impoverished island nations, has a responsibility to help them maintain stability.
He announced last month that the army would be boosted by 2,600 troops and the federal police force by 400 to cope with increasing international deployments.
But he rejected suggestions that he aspired to be the region's sheriff.
"Can I just place on the record my rejection of the proposition that Australia has become the sheriff of the Pacific," he told reporters.
On Wednesday, however, a clearly annoyed Howard said he would not accept Solomons Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare's expulsion of Canberra's high commissioner over an inquiry into rioting and for meddling in internal politics.
"We don't accept for a moment the expulsion of our high commissioner Patrick Cole," Howard told national radio, setting the stage for a diplomatic showdown.
"He was doing the right thing, he was representing the interests of Australia, he was concerned about corruption in the Solomon Islands," he said.
Howard's government has indicated it is concerned that the Solomons-appointed inquiry into the April riots would be used to put the blame on Australian police and exonerate two of Sogavare's political colleagues.
The Solomons government has suggested that the firing of tear gas at a political protest sparked the riots which led to the capital Honiara being trashed by rampaging mobs.
"There's a long-standing history of corruption and incompetence on the part of the government there and there has been a tendency to blame everybody but themselves for their problems," said Deakin University analyst Damien Kingsbury. "The reality is if Australia does not assist, many of these places would be in dire straits."
Australia was also blamed by the East Timorese Prime Minister Ramos Horta for a jailbreak last month that saw rebel military officer Alfredo Reinado walk out of prison with 56 others.
Howard and Foreign Minister Alexander Downer strenuously denied the charge, saying responsibility for prison security was in the hands of the East Timorese.
But Dupont said there was an element of joint responsibility for what he called "the great escape."
"I think that the security provided by the East Timorese was lax and the New Zealand and Australian security forces should have been a bit more alert to what might happen," he said.
Dupont said, however, that Australia was trying to be an honest broker in implementing the policy outlined by Howard three years ago to help stabilize some of the weak states in the region.
He said Australia's more active approach was driven by the need to prevent states failing, which could then create security problems, as well as a humanitarian obligation.
He dismissed as "a nonsense" the favorite taunt of former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad that Australia was simply US President George W. Bush's "deputy sheriff" in the region.
"This is our backyard. If we had no relation with the US, we would be doing the same. We believe as the major power in the region that we have an obligation," Dupont said.
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)