Following the government's proposed budget for procuring 66 F-16C/D fighter jets from the US last month, the question of national defense -- the victim of partisan squabbling over the past two years -- is once again the focus of public attention. But, sadly Taiwan's security situation is still gloomy and its implications are seriously underestimated.
In order to show a willingness and determination to defend itself, the government allocated the budget to buy the F-16s before the US officially announced the deal. However opposition legislators objected to that. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Yu-fang (
As we are all too aware, the US government declared a package of arms for Taiwan in 2001. The opposition parties, including the KMT and the People First Party (PFP), have vetoed this arms procurement bill 56 times in the legislature since June 8, 2004, despite the fact that the arms budget was reduced from NT$480 billion (US$14.6 billion) to NT$6.2 billion. No doubt, the latest objections are just further excuses to block the arms budget.
In addition, when Defense News, a US weekly, revealed that the US has not agreed to the F-16 deal because the long-stalled arms procurement bill is still unresolved, KMT legislators adeptly brushed aside accusations directed at them. KMT Legislator Shuai Hua-min (
When we delve into Shuai's words, however, the truth is rather different. According to a report in the Taipei Times, (Aug. 31, 2006, p.3), a telegram sent to the National Defense Ministry from the US strongly blamed the Legislative Yuan for the long-delayed special arms procurement bill. One US senior official even warned that whether the arms procurement budget was passed in the Legislative Yuan or not in the next two months would not only demonstrate Taiwan's determination to defend itself, but be crucial to whether Taiwan-US relations would strengthen, stagnate or even go backward. After reading the message, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) admitted that the delay in the passage of the arms bill would impact national security.
No one would doubt the professionalism of the two opposition legislators -- the former a political scientist, the latter a retired lieutenant general -- and their patriotism. As China has approximately 800 ballistic missiles pointing at Taiwan and is adding missiles at an annual rate of 75 to 100, the opposition parties' obfuscation in the past six years is seriously eroding Taiwan's national security.
In 2003, the government allocated NT$28.4 billion to buy four Kidd-class destroyers, part of the arms package which US President George W. Bush approved in 2001. The opposition used all kinds of tactics to obstruct the passage of the arms bill, and even falsely accused the government of intentionally floating the budget. As a result of opposition threats to boycott the procurement, the budget was reduced to NT$28 billion. Consequently, the number of SM-2 missiles deployed on the four destroyers was cut to half its original figure, which considerably undermines the warships' fighting capability, according to Taiwanese naval officials.
Currently, there is a growing impression that Taiwan is neglecting its own defense, not only in the US government but also in think tanks and among academics. James Mulvenon, a prominent expert on Taiwan, bluntly comments that the reason Taiwan has been able to do this is its belief in a "blank check of military support from the United States." In other words, those who hold this view judge that Taiwan's current approach relies on potential US military intervention in any conflict with China, rather than bolstering its own capacity, to resist a Chinese attack.
On the other hand, Ted Galen Carpenter, a researcher at the Cato Institute, in his book America's Coming War With China: A Collision Course Over Taiwan argues that the US should disengage from Taiwan, because China's patience regarding the incorporation of Taiwan into China is wearing thin and a growing number of Taiwanese want independence, both of which could lead to war between the US and China.
Although Carpenter's view of the US-China war scenario and his prescription is not yet in the mainstream of Washington's foreign policy, this apocalyptic view practically reflects the core values of US foreign policy thinking that nothing is above national interests. That is to say, in order to safeguard national interests, it is possible that the US might be forced to abandon democratic Taiwan to totalitarian China, if it finds itself unable to compete militarily with Beijing.
With the serious security challenges facing Taiwan and the US strongly critical of Taiwan's laxness regarding its own defense, it is surprising that KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) claim that his party's repeated blocking of the arms bill is not only reasonable but is winning US respect for Taiwan's prudent attitude on the arms procurement issue. Furthermore, Ma solemnly argues that the KMT only supports "reasonable arms purchase," which means the purchased weapons should meet Taiwan's defense needs, its budget should not be a financial burden on the government, and all citizens support the arms purchase.
Ironically, these plausible arguments could soon become empty words. According to the latest reports, under pressure from the US, Ma has implied that the KMT will dramatically change its position on the long-delayed arms procurement bill when the new legislative session begins this month. If this is the case, what the KMT did over the past two years would be proved to be a politically-motivated farce at the expense of Taiwan's security.
The nation is at a security crossroads and further procrastination in arms procurement could threaten its very existence. Although it is still too early to say whether the arms bill will be passed or not, it will be the opposition's last chance to decide whether they want to improve Taiwan's defensive capabilities.
Tu Ho-ting is a Taiwan-based journalist and analyst.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS