In the 20th century, while the process of democratization progressed around the world, the People's Republic of China moved in completely the opposite direction. China claims that Taiwan (including the Pescadores) are part of its territory and threatens to use force if Taiwan declares independence. The most ironic thing is that the UN supports China's assertions!
Since World War II, self-determination has received popular support around the world, and with the UN acting as a mediator, more than 100 new nations have been established. The former USSR and communist-ruled Eastern Bloc nations recognized the trend toward democracy and broke up into many independent nations. The one-party dictatorship system was also abandoned.
The colony nations in Africa and Asia, one after another, severed links with their colonial rulers and became sovereign nations.
These developments have two common points. First, many of the newly established nations had long been ruled by people of a different race. Second, the communist system fell apart. We applaud this result, because we have finally realized the intrinsic value of each individual.
What does this have to do with China's claims upon Taiwan? Let's look at history. China's Qing Dynasty ceded Taiwan to Japan after it lost the war with Japan in 1895.
Then, in 1911, Sun Yat-sen's (
Besides the changed name, the PRC also gained a new Constitution, a new national flag and new national anthem.
In light of this history, it is clear that Taiwan is not related to either the ROC or the PRC.
Should Taiwan be denied in its bid for self-determination -- which is really a formality, because Taiwan in almost all aspects is an independent country -- the nation could only be returned to the Qing Dynasty or its legal successor, but could not "revert" back to being part of the PRC, as the PRC did not exist when this nation was founded.
Furthermore, when so many former colonies have thrown off their colonial rulers, why should Taiwan instead accept a merger with the PRC when this nation has never been ruled by that government? Where is the international sense of justice and morality in this case?
Frankly speaking, any attempt to force a merger between Taiwan and China will be in vain, as the Taiwanese will never accept one-party dictatorship under the communist system that lags far behind the values and norms held by most nations around the world.
Taiwanese sources have indicated that they will submit a membership application in the name of Taiwan to the UN this month.
I sincerely request that all UN Security Council members earnestly observe the spirit of the UN Charter and do the moral thing by immediately stopping China's hegemony and granting membership to Taiwan.
Joseph Wang
Morris Plains, New Jersey
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS