For a while, postcolonial Taiwan was the economic leader among the four "Asian Tigers." Politically, it implemented direct presidential elections and a transfer of power within a few years. Western products and technology can now be found everywhere. Reform in the political, economic and educational spheres, however, has stagnated and even gone backwards.
Consider the nouveau riche. Despite living in mansions, driving expensive cars, carrying Louis Vuitton bags and using cellphones, computers, the Internet and other modern technology, they are involved in traffic accidents, bully employees and deceive customers.
We know upstarts will repeat these mistakes until they stop relying on extravagance and review their flaws. Similarly, if Taiwan -- at the crossroads of reform -- does not review its past and condemn its colonial history, it will not complete its transformation into a modern nation.
If we ask who should take the most responsibility for reform, the answer is not any single political party. Rather, it is academia, especially the intellectuals who direct social thinking. Corruption in society is a reflection of their failure. Intellectuals in power who clutch their halo of Western science and direct policy formulation while ignoring our postcolonial mindset are the main cause of our "self-colonization."
Take education: Although we have adopted Western educational ideologies, test results remain the only standard for measuring academic performance.
In medicine, divination often outweighs professional medical prescriptions.
In economics, blind development of the high-tech industry has turned Taiwan into a satellite factory for US multinational firms, giving the US greater power than even colonial rulers.
Worse, under the expensive World-Class University Plan, intellectuals make every effort to publish articles in journals recognized by the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) and the Science Citation Index (SCI), rendering themselves dependent on US academia.
While Taiwan may appear to have adopted many aspects of Western civilization, we continue to follow a traditional value system. In other words, Taiwan is like a freed slave who wants to prove his superiority by his old master's standards. Thus, despite the transfer of power in 2000, the new government is repeating the policies of the old government.
We must initiate a "constructive destruction" -- a comprehensive review of the damage remaining from the colonial past, then the construction of a new value system. During the colonial era, existing simply meant staying alive, while in the 21st century's knowledge-based society, existing means improving life values. Earlier, people were slaves due to greed and fear; now, people strive to self-realize out of interest and passion.
Morality plays an important role in both eras. Morality was used to punish and subdue colonial subjects; now it is a spontaneous force for regulating oneself. These are opposing standards.
Only through a complete assessment of our colonial history can we set new standards and build a new social order. That is also the only way to build a political and educational system supporting a knowledge-based economy.
We believe the impotence and laziness of intellectuals created Taiwan's difficulties. If this elite can muster enough moral courage, sense of historical mission and conscience, we sincerely ask them to apply "pan-historic" moral values as part of a comprehensive review of their activities.
Tseng Kuei-hi is a doctor and former chairman of the Southern Taiwan Society. Bob Kuo is a professor of information systems at National Sun Yat-sen University and former vice chairman of the Southern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Perry Svensson
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more