The sit-in organized by former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) calling on President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to stand down has resulted in another wave of social cleavage and partisan wrestling.
Shih has cast a political shadow over Chen's already-fragile leadership, especially in light of the pan-blue camp's attempt to recall the president.
Chen's failure to uphold higher moral standards and enforce stricter discipline among his family and staff has disappointed a lot of DPP supporters. However, Shih's claim to "seek revolutionary means to oust Chen" is inappropriate in a democratic system.
Taiwan's imperfect democratic institutions provide legitimate channels for the public to recall or impeach a president. But the Constitution also serves as an important safety mechanism for maintaining political stability when movements to oust officials are launched.
The public is smart enough to settle for a president's declining popularity and loss of influence before an election. The public is also confident enough in its country to respect constitutional rules and avoid unconstitutional measures in bringing about a change in government.
In this regard, the public has sent a clear message to political leaders that political stability and economic order are what concern them the most. Conflict between the governing and opposition parties should be brought to an end.
We should take seriously the public's craving for stability and respect judicial procedures in unveiling the truth. If evidence shows that Chen was personally responsible for illegal activity, he should bear the political and moral responsibility and resign.
Yet Chen's resignation would not solve any of the structural problems with government. Indeed, it could trigger an even more severe political crisis. The pan-blue alliance would obstruct Chen's successor and exploit the transfer of power.
Can Taiwan afford a prolonged crisis lasting until 2008? Can Shih guarantee -- as he has claimed -- that the ruling and opposition parties will engage in a rational dialogue if Chen resigns?
As a country struggling to deepen its democracy, Taiwan yearns for more discipline, institutionalization and order in all phases of its national life.
Upset with endless finger-pointing, a sense of political unrest and instability, the manipulation of ethnicity and a the DPP's apparent trend toward political decay and corruption, voters are looking for national reconciliation, a strong leadership that can enhance an institutionalized system of politics, a truly independent judiciary and relatively clean politics.
The experiences of the "third-wave democracies" of Asia, Africa and Latin America illustrate the essential need for political authority in a changing society to develop disciplined and effective institutions that can cope with rapid social change and prevent cronyism. If Taiwanese society suffers a decline in the political order and loses trust in the constitutional system, the result will be an undermining of political leadership and an erosion of government legitimacy.
The nature and structure of political institutions determine whether democratic progress can be made and whether cronyism and corruption can be rooted out.
Taiwan has been fortunate to avoid disorder such as military coups, violent protests and the resurrection of authoritarian regimes. Still, the tendency toward corrupt politics under DPP rule reminds us of the path that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) walked in the past.
The question that we face is whether Taiwan will follow this path to political decay or whether we have the determination to strengthen our institutions.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
An article on the Nature magazine Web site reports that 22 scientists last month wrote to the daily Dagens Nyheter criticizing Sweden’s no-lockdown response to COVID-19. However, evidence-based analysis shows that a lockdown is not a one-size-fits-all strategy and Sweden is showing the world a sustainable way for everybody to fearlessly live with the virus, which is an inevitable situation that everyone must face and accept for a while. The biggest myth about lockdowns is that they are the only solution when an epidemic worsens. A lockdown is a measure to cordon off a seriously affected area so that people in
On Monday, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) spoke during the opening ceremony of this year’s World Health Assembly (WHA). For the first time in the assembly’s history, attendees, including Xi, had to dial in virtually. Xi made no acknowledgement of the Chinese government’s role in causing the COVID-19 pandemic, nor was there any meaningful apology. Instead, he painted China as a benign force for good and a friend to all nations. Except Taiwan, of course. The address was a reheated version of the speech Xi gave at the 2017 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Xi again attempted to step into the
China’s prevention of Taiwan’s participation as an observer at the World Health Assembly (WHA), the WHO and other UN specialized institutions is misleading the world. China always asserts that UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 established the so-called “one China principle,” in which Taiwan is a province of China. This is fake information that is part of China’s grand external propaganda strategy. Resolution 2758 made clear that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the sole legitimate representative of China at the UN and its specialized institutions. However, there is not a single word related to Taiwan in the resolution, no mention of the