During his election campaign in 2000, President Chen Shui-bian (
I then wrote a note that I asked Lee to give to Chen, saying: "Building a new country is more important than winning the presidency."
It really isn't very important to be president, especially not in the kind of extended settler state known as "the Republic of China."
I really do not care very much about whether the president steps down or not, but the fact that I am not participating in the ongoing efforts to force him out of office does not mean that I support him.
To be blunt, during his six years in office, Chen has not put all his efforts into building a new country. Instead, his "Four Noes" policy and his statement that those participating in the campaign to create a new constitution and change the nation's title were deceiving themselves have made me very resentful, and I have criticized him for it.
I have been particularly angered by the increasingly Chinese Nationalist Party-like (KMT) demeanor of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Good examples of this behavior can be seen in the alleged corruption of presidential aide Chen Che-nan (
The attempts by the pan-blue camp to recall Chen are not a new phenomenon. The only difference is that this time, they have found a righteous slogan: "anti-corruption."
I will never be able to believe that the KMT is working against corruption, because their own ranks are full of it. If we counted the number of corruption cases or the amounts involved, the cases the KMT has been involved in would always outnumber those of the DPP.
In the end, the KMT is engaging in political warfare -- in cooperation with their fellow travelers in the media -- trying to destroy the image of the localized government in order to restore their old regime.
With this basic understanding, it is of course impossible for me to follow up on the failed recall motion by joining hands with the pan-green academics in a continued attempt to accomplish the pan-blue camp's unfinished undertaking. It would be even more impossible for me to get up on stage with former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) and let him use me as his tool, especially after having found that this group of people is filled with those looking for publicity, a platform or benefits. My craving for clean government demands that I not condescend to mixing with these people.
This group of people who want the president to step down of course also includes some of my friends, and I don't doubt their idealism. Their focus on one issue, however, differs from my habit of looking at overall strategy. The nation has many unsettled accounts from the last 50-odd years, but the group only focuses on the "greed" that surrounds the president. This seems to be quite disproportionate.
I also want these idealistic friends of mine to ask Shih why he didn't support our side during the past few years when we have been under vicious attack by the pan-blue camp, in which they and their communist backers have worked to destroy the cause of Taiwanese independence. Why is Shih now instead standing on the side of the pan-blue camp and calling on the president to step down?
In a letter to President Chen, Shih said that he had once asked the president to guarantee that he would insist that "Taiwan is a sovereign and independent state, and never retreat from that point of view." Shih also asked the president to insist that "the people of Taiwan have the right to decide their own future, and will never give up that right."
Will Shih be able to ask the people making donations to his anti-Chen campaign -- and the media that support him -- to insist on these same principles?
Finally, I would like to ask if the president's resignation would mean that the pan-blue camp will let the Legislative Yuan discuss the arms procurement bill. Will they be able to stop opposing and blocking the government's every move? Will the KMT return the national assets it has stolen? Will it stop colluding with the Chinese Communists? These are issues that should also be considered when we talk about whether President Chen should step down.
If he really does step down, I want him to pass my note on to Vice President Annette Lu (
Lee Hsiao-feng is a professor of history at Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press