Southeast Asia's club of nations, ASEAN, turned 39 on Tuesday and already it appears to be grappling with a mid-life crisis.
ASEAN, born out of the Cold War of the 1960s, began as a group of newly independent states dedicated to fighting communism and aching for stability.
Four decades later, on "ASEAN Day," the group has developed a middle-age obsession: economics. It's in a race to remain competitive against the emerging might of China and India.
And, so far, despite plenty of frustration with ASEAN's pace of reform, the club appears to be making some progress.
"Twenty years ago or more, there was a long-standing consensus that you shouldn't take ASEAN declarations at their word," said Natasha Hamilton-Hart, associate professor of Southeast Asian studies at the National University of Singapore.
"They were typically vague sort of statements of intent ... Often they were not intended to be followed by any hard, binding commitments. But I think that's changed," she said.
ASEAN is still a long way from becoming a kind of EU, which is only a decade older: there is no single market, it has a kaleidoscope of different currencies and political systems, and it still doesn't even exist as a legal entity.
But in the search for economies of scale, to avoid being robbed of foreign investment by China and India, ASEAN has made integration its mantra. It sounds like an EU in the making.
Its big dream is a "single community," where goods, services and labor flow freely across borders, and it is drafting a charter that could enshrine its recently declared adherence to democracy, human rights and the rule of law.
ASEAN also has a free-trade area, although it is riddled with temporary exclusions, and plans to put in place visa-free travel, to be followed by an open-skies airline policy.
"There are many steps that we need to take, in order to see the birth of an ASEAN community," Malaysian Foreign Minister Syed Hamid Albar told an ASEAN flag-raising ceremony on Tuesday.
That is an understatement -- especially given that ASEAN wants to become a single market by 2020, or within the next 10 years if a proposal to bring the date forward to 2015 is adopted.
Even ASEAN's supporters believe it would do well to achieve even some of what it has set out to do.
"We're not going to get the common market even of the type Europe had in the 1980s by 2015," said Manu Bhaskaran, a partner at economics consultancy Centennial Group in Singapore.
ASEAN's progress may be slow, and modest by EU standards, but it so far appears to be meeting the competitive threats from China and India, Bhaskaran added.
"ASEAN is beginning very slowly -- too slowly -- but they are beginning to make some of the painful decisions to really put progress on the road," he said.
Foreign direct investment dipped in China between 2004 and 2005, according to UN figures, while investment in two major ASEAN economies -- Thailand and Indonesia -- actually rose.
Last year, ASEAN states Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Vietnam were all tipped to perform well in terms of foreign direct investment in the medium term, according to a survey published by the UN Conference on Trade and Development.
Taken together, ASEAN encompasses more than 500 million people and has combined gross domestic product of more than US$800 billion, bigger than India, according to World Bank 2005 data.
As economic and social union beckons -- political union is still a bridge too far for ASEAN -- the group faces many barriers, including one of its own making: its founding principle of non-interference in a member state's domestic affairs.
Once held up as almost sacred to ASEAN, the principle has come under increasing pressure for review in the group's dealings with military-run Myanmar, which has shown little sign of moving toward democracy despite years of friendly prodding.
Myanmar's senior general, Than Shwe, used ASEAN Day on Tuesday to call for fellow members to abide by non-interference, but instead Malaysia's prime minister said non-interference might have to make room for ASEAN's new agenda: integration.
"That principle might require refinement, especially in the face of the onslaught of globalization," Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said in his ASEAN Day lecture in Kuala Lumpur.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press