Taiwan's democracy and identity are serious topics that touch on the nation's very existence.
Two recent events have caught the attention of the Taiwanese public. First, the premiere of a documentary entitled Taiwan's Road to Democracy caused a sensation among the nation's pro-localization forces. The second event was the second signature drive by a group of pan-green academics, which focused on democracy and identity in an attempt to review the govern-ment's performance and the maturity of Taiwan's civil society.
Both events dealt with the same subject matter from different perspectives. The documentary praises the nation's democratic achievements between 1988 and 2000, claiming that Taiwan has won international acclaim for transforming itself from an authoritarian society into a democracy through a peaceful revolution. It also reminds the Taiwanese to defy hardship and danger and launch the next stage of democratization.
The signature drive launched by the pro-green academics highlighted their frustration and disappointment with the stalled process of democratization that has resulted from the country's identity crisis, and asked the public to consider how to enrich Taiwan's national identity through democratic values.
The documentary reflects every crucial event and turning point in the nation's pursuit of democracy and how, for every step toward democracy, Taiwan has further clarified its relationship with China. It also shows how this has led to a clearer understanding of what Taiwan is and who we are, and how democratization had led to localization and the formation of a Taiwanese identity.
This culminated in former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) proposal of a "special state-to-state" formula to define cross-strait relations and the transfer of power to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in 2000.
However, following the DPP's ascent to power, the nation's democracy has been dealt a series of blows as a result of the conflict between the pan-green and pan-blue camps. The opposition-dominated legislature has rendered ineffective the popularly elected government's attempt to implement policy, while Taiwanese identity has been eroded as a result of the economic attraction of China, the influence of Taiwan's China-leaning politicians and parties and a wavering government.
Taiwan has temporarily lost its confidence and a sense of direction to guide its future development. When contemplating a solution, the government should set the agenda it intends to follow in the next stage of democratization and kick-start that stage to focus and strengthen national awareness among the public.
During the first stage of democratization, a conference on national affairs was convened, the "Communist rebellion" era was ended, the Constitution was reinstated and lifetime employment for legislators and National Assembly members was ended. The Constitution has been amended six times. We now have full legislative and direct presidential elections. Over the past 12 years, every move that Taiwan has made has been intended to help the nation grow stronger and become a normal country.
For Taiwanese identity to be further deepened, the Taiwanese people must have confidence. The question of how the government should go about enhancing the nation's performance on the political, economic and cultural fronts in order to build confidence among the Taiwanese thus becomes crucial to building national identity.
There is no denying that China's rapid cultural and economic rise on the international stage in recent years has led to a growing sense of inferiority and China-leaning attitudes among the Taiwanese public. According to a survey conducted by the Chinese-language magazine Global Views Monthly, China, trailing only Japan and the US, is the country that Taiwanese admire the most.
In this survey, South Korea, one of the four Asian tigers, is ranked fourth. With their tremendous confidence in their country, the South Koreans have fared better than Taiwan on the economic and cultural fronts.
The most urgent task the government is facing in its policy implementation now is building confidence among the public and making them proud to be Taiwanese.
Margot Chen is a research fellow at Taiwan Advocates, a think tank initiated by former president Lee Teng-hui.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press