Wu Nai-teh (
I agree that politicians -- especially the president -- should aspire to higher moral and legal standards than the average person. Many of my friends and I myself are not at all satisfied with Chen's leadership style and political reforms to date.
However, I do not feel that Chen should step down as president following his in-laws' indictment. Has this stained the first family's reputation? Yes. Is Chen guilty of not surrounding himself with clean, capable advisers, and has this tarnished his political reputation? Yes. Do these alleged crimes justify ousting him? No.
Although I personally look forward to the day when Chen vacates the office, I hope that day will be when his presidential term expires. This would conform with the rule of law as established in the Constitution, not to mention with the ways of democracy, which the pan-green academics hold in such high esteem.
I'm more worried about what would happen if Chen were forced out of office. The elite would probably be well equipped to deal with the ensuing instability, but what about the rest of society?
Have these people ever considered what forcing the president out of office would do to pan-green supporters, emotionally and psychologically? And what would the political state of affairs be after Chen is ousted? What measures are needed to deal with the aftermath and is the country prepared to do so? And who can guarantee that the pan-blues won't launch a second or even a third campaign to continue to reap the benefits of such instability?
Perhaps these academics would say that pain must be endured to achieve better democratic governance. This includes requesting a president one supports to step down on the basis of holding him to a higher moral standard.
But while somebody like me can adjust to such a change and live with the aftermath, somebody like my mother, who lives in the countryside, cannot. She would ask me, "Chen didn't break any law. Why does he have to step down?" Must we really force Chen out of office because that's what pan-blue politicians and the pro-unification media want?
A Taiwanese is president -- do we really have to let him get stepped on like this? The pan-blues have been stepping on us, Taiwanese, for 40, 50 years. Isn't that long enough?
Yes, this is ethnic awareness, firmly planted in the minds of every person. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) doesn't need to mobilize its supporters; the Taiwanese identity already exists in the people's hearts and minds. Throughout our history, if the Taiwanese were bullied to the point where it became unbearable, they have risen up in revolt.
The call to a southern Taiwan radio show by a woman talking about "raising our hoes in revolt," which unexpectedly sparked a movement to resist efforts to recall the president, is a prime example, as was the 228 Incident. In the case of the anti-recall movement, the DPP was merely a hesitating, wavering "reserve force" -- slower to act than its supporters.
In other words, the DPP did not play the ethnic card -- rather, ethnic groups mobilized the DPP: The will to fight grew stronger among enraged pan-green supporters, who in the end intervened in the mudfight between the blue and green camps.
The problem of national identity has always existed in Taiwanese society, but the majority of the pan-green supporters whom I've come into contact with are good, tolerant people. Every time they have taken to the streets to protest, it was because they were stirred to anger by pan-blue forces. Thus, I feel that the pan-blue politicians and media are the main stumbling blocks to resolving issues of ethnicity and identity in Taiwan -- the DPP and its supporters are not the problem.
I would also like to pose the following questions to Wu and his friends: Why isn't the pan-blues' mobilization of supporters to protest near the Presidential Office considered "ethnic mobilization?" On the other hand, if pan-green supporters rally en masse, the DPP is immediately accused of "ethnic mobilization." Is this double standard a part of your notion of "high morality?"
Why do you consistently appropriate language used by the pan-blue media, such as "the DPP manipulates ethnic mobilization" to describe the events of the recall movement? If you choose only to read the China Times, or only to submit your writings to the China Times, won't your political and social objectivity be compromised? Can't you see that many of the China Times' reports are biased and are an attempt to manipulate politics?
Of course, intellectuals should closely scrutinize their political leaders -- such monitoring prevents the corruption that inevitably follows when leaders become too powerful. I too am demoralized by the DPP's lack of direction and clarity, but in the past six years, I have never seen you write articles criticizing the inappropriate and destabilizing behavior of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party. Why?
On the road to healthy democratic development, the ruling party has an absolute responsibility to the people; but shouldn't opposition parties also have a responsibility to the people?
My reason for writing this piece is not to incite conflict between the academics and myself. I am sincerely seeking an answer to what is happening because I believe that all the parties in this affair love this country. The only real difference lies in our expression of that love -- in our methods and political judgment.
Michelle Wang is the vice executive secretary of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Max Hirsch
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS