Much of the world seems fascinated by the fact that Poland is now governed by a set of identical twins who first became famous as child movie actors: President Lech Kaczynski and Prime Minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski. They are indeed intriguing, but the political forces they represent are even more interesting -- and worrying.
Since the fall of last year, the Kaczynskis have led a conservative-populist coalition, with a dose of nationalism -- represented by the small League of Polish Families (LPR) -- thrown in. The Polish right was last in power in 1997, having previously governed in the years 1990-1993. The post-communist Party of the Democratic Left (SLD) was voted out in 1997, despite a five-year streak of economic prosperity and rapidly falling unemployment. Although the SLD's popularity remained high, the previously fragmented right prevailed due to temporary unity.
In 1998, however, prosperity vanished. So the right's turn in government was followed by years of stagnation and unemployment. Unable to cope with the downturn, the right was replaced by another SLD-led government in 2001.
During this period, the right disintegrated. Among the splinter groups that arose were the conservative Law and Justice Party (PiS) and the nationalist LPR. As they emerged, the left was faltering: the economy did not improve, unemployment remained high, and the SLD, which attracted all kinds of riffraff, became mired in corruption scandals.
But the large swings in Polish politics are not merely the result of political shenanigans. They reflect the instincts of Polish voters. People vote for all kinds of parties, from the far right all the way to the left, so long as they are convinced that the parties will deal with their social concerns and grievances.
The fusion of an irresponsible right-wing campaign and economic stagnation made Poland's "wandering" electorate shift in the direction of the PiS, whose success was mostly due to its leader, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, currently the right's most prominent politician. Kaczynski presented this fluid electorate with a credible vision of a state concerned with social solidarity (with no one's refrigerator standing empty) and opposed to heartless liberalism (with offers empty refrigerators for the poor and full ones for the rich). This contrast, and a strong attack on the liberal Civic Platform, made it impossible to create a moderate right-wing coalition.
Having rejected Civic Platform as a partner, Kaczynski decided to ally his minority PiS with the populist Self-Defense party and the nationalist LPR. The stated goal of the new alliance was to establish what Kaczynski calls the "Fourth Republic" (implying a constitutional break with the supposedly compromised post-1989 Third Republic). The Kaczynskis want to destroy the "corrupt system composed of careerist politicians, post-communists, former secret service functionaries, and criminal organizations," who, according to the twins, have ruled Poland since 1989.
The Fourth Republic is supposed to be republican, rather than liberal, with greater state involvement in the economy. It is to be a democracy steered from above, with only a limited division of power and a streak of authoritarianism, guided by a mixture of conservatism, populism and nationalism. It is to be assertive in its dealings with the EU -- perhaps not so much Euro-skeptical as "Euro-difficult" -- aping Margaret Thatcher's Britain of the 1980s, despite Poland's being poorer and less politically influential than Thatcher's Britain was.
The notion of a Fourth Republic has incited heated opposition. President Lech Kaczynski's approval ratings, are dramatically lower those of his predecessor, the SLD's Aleksander Kwasniewski. His brother, Jaroslaw, has always evoked popular mistrust. Most Poles did not vote for the Kaczynskis and still do not want to follow them. But they did not see the risk in letting them gain so much power, and so did not mobilize to block them.
New elections are not due until 2009. To be sure, a political crisis can bring the coalition down, but this can happen only if Poland's "wandering" electorate decides that the PiS has let it down.
That looks unlikely. The coalition took power at the start of what seems to be a new period of prosperity, underpinned by large EU subsidies. As a result, there will be room for myriad favors for special interests and for boosting social benefits, which may buy time for the PiS and its vision of a Fourth Republic.
How far will the twins push their idea? Jaroslaw Kaczynski is an intelligent politician who understands the link between currency stability and political success. So he will not allow government largesse to become excessive and thus risk a negative reaction in the financial markets.
Yet the strong link between the fate of the coalition (and that of the Fourth Republic) and a fickle electorate addicted to social benefits will block the serious reforms that are needed to put the economy on a sound footing in the long term. This will likely result in a gradual loss of economic competitiveness -- all the more dangerous for being obscured by the temporary boost from EU funds, which will help maintain the government's popular support. In that case, life with the twins could become more interesting than Poland needs.
Waldemar Kuczynski, a former minister of privatization, was the main economic adviser to prime minister Jerzy Buzek from 1997 to 2001.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
With the Year of the Snake reaching its conclusion on Monday next week, now is an opportune moment to reflect on the past year — a year marked by institutional strain and national resilience. For Taiwan, the Year of the Snake was a composite of political friction, economic momentum, social unease and strategic consolidation. In the political sphere, it was defined less by legislative productivity and more by partisan confrontation. The mass recall movement sought to remove 31 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators following the passage of controversial bills that expanded legislative powers and imposed sweeping budget cuts. While the effort
There is a story in India about a boy called Prahlad who was an ardent worshipper of Lord Narayana, whom his father considered an enemy. His son’s devotion vexed the father to the extent that he asked his sister, Holika, who could not be burned by fire, to sit with the boy in her lap and burn him to death. Prahlad knew about this evil plan, but sat in his aunt’s lap anyway. His faith won, as he remained unscathed by the fire, while his aunt was devoured by the flames. In some small way, Prahlad reminds me of Taiwan
When Hong Kong’s High Court sentenced newspaper owner Jimmy Lai (黎智英) to 20 years in prison this week, officials declared that his “heinous crimes” had long poisoned society and that his punishment represented justice restored. In their telling, Lai is the mastermind of Hong Kong’s unrest — the architect of a vast conspiracy that manipulated an otherwise contented population into defiance. They imply that removing him would lead to the return of stability. It is a politically convenient narrative — and a profoundly false one. Lai did not radicalize Hong Kong. He belonged to the same generation that fled from the Chinese
The top Chinese official in charge of Taiwan policy this week said that Beijing must gain dominance in cross-strait relations and firmly support “patriotic pro-reunification forces” in Taiwan. All Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials must “firmly grasp the initiative and dominance in cross-strait relations” to advance the “great cause of national reunification across the Taiwan Strait,” Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧) said at the Taiwan Work Conference, China’s annual event outling policies on Taiwan. Wang also reiterated the need to adhere to the “one China principle” and the so-called “1992 consensus,” to support Taiwanese compatriots who firmly support