Kuwait has just held its 11th parliamentary election since independence in 1961. Though Kuwait is a monarchy, its parliamentary history has not been placid, and the election campaign reflected ongoing tensions between the royal family and segments of the electorate.
Originally scheduled for October 2007, the election was brought forward to break a deadlock between the parliament and the government over the number of electoral districts in the country. There are 25 constituencies nationwide, but reformers have long argued that a smaller number of voting districts -- each with a larger number of voters -- would be less susceptible to manipulation by the political elite.
The 29 members of parliament who support a reduced number of constituencies were unable to agree with the government on a new number. As a result, the issue became the focus of a vigorous campaign by discontented Kuwaitis, who gathered in front of the National Assembly building and in universities to voice their criticism.
In response, the government moved the redistricting issue from parliament to the constitutional court -- an attempt, reformers argued, to hold back change. When three members of parliament sought to question the prime minister -- their right, under the Kuwaiti Constitution -- the parliament was dissolved and elections called.
The rules of political life in Kuwait have been worked out over the 300 years since this small area emerged as a self-contained polity. The royal family is empowered to administer the country, but does so through consultation with different sectors, like tribal leaders or merchant groups.
When independence came in 1961, these rules were codified in a Constitution. Compared to other Gulf monarchies, the Kuwaiti royal family has limited powers, though constitutional rules have frequently been ignored -- charges of vote-rigging marred the 1967 election, and the parliament has been dissolved several times during the country's history.
Nevertheless, since Kuwait was liberated from Iraqi occupation in August 1990, the parliament has gained both stability and respect. The dissolutions of parliament in 1999 and this year were carried out according to the law, and elections were called in a timely fashion.
Parliament retains the right to interrogate Cabinet members, including the prime minister, on financial and administrative questions, and has frequently passed motions of no confidence in the government. More recently, with the death last December of Emir Sheikh Jabir al-Ahmad, parliamentary approval played a key role in resolving succession debates among factions of the royal family.
Overall, Kuwait has always had a lively political life, with more freedom of expression and less political repression than is common in neighboring countries. Political violence has been rare. Though political parties have not been legalized, they are nonetheless active in parliament and public life. Kuwaiti life reflects the many and varied political trends throughout the Arab world, and the country's open society and economic opportunities have made it a powerful magnet and regional safety valve since the 1950s.
In the last election, Kuwaiti women participated in choosing the parliament for the first time. Though women have long been active in Kuwaiti public life, they were enfranchised only last year, after a long and difficult campaign, when they gained suffrage by a parliamentary vote, though they accounted for just 28 of the 249 candidates.
Kuwait's voting population is 57 percent female, and local commentators speculated on the likely impact of women voters. Would they follow the voting patterns of their husbands? Clearly, women demonstrated tremendous enthusiasm for the political process, taking part in large numbers in political rallies, and as campaign workers in a range of election activities. In the end, while a loose opposition coalition of pro-reform former members of parliament, Islamists and liberals gained a majority of the National Assembly's 50 seats, no woman won.
The electorate focused almost entirely on the question of electoral districts. Most Kuwaitis see this very technical issue as a way of pressing for reform. Major regional issues, like the war in Iraq or Iran's nuclear program, were barely mentioned.
Islamist candidates were in an awkward position, seeking support from women voters -- whose participation they opposed. However, Islamists were among the 29 parliamentary deputies pushing for constituency reform, a fact that eased their dilemma. Support for reform comes from across the political spectrum, whereas opponents of reform paid a high price. Indeed, three members of the outgoing parliament who supported the government were not candidates, having lost in their tribal primaries.
With pro-reform forces strengthening their position in the new parliament, the government has two choices. It can go along with electoral reform, or it can find an opportunity to dissolve the new parliament. Commentators are already speculating on how long the new parliament will survive.
Whatever the immediate outcome, the Kuwaiti government is facing a new political horizon. Women are now the majority of voters, and young people have taken up the reform banner. Democracy will push the ruling family forward.
Ghanim al-Najjar is a professor of political science at Kuwait University. Copyight: Project Syndicate
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS