President Chen Shui-bian's (
What is happening, however, is that the government is treading water, the pan-blue camp is launching frenzied attacks, the TAIEX is in a free fall, the pro-localization groups stand united in support of Chen and ethnic tension is brewing.
Faced with this crisis, Taiwan is in desperate need of a third voice to restore public trust and consolidate democracy so that it will not fall victim to irresponsible political infighting and media sensationalism.
Therefore, the Taipei Society is urging politicians to stop using claims that they represent public opinion as an excuse for engaging in populism, thus destroying our democratic system.
Since the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) came to power, it has emulated the money politics of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by leaning toward big business, which has led to a complicated relationship between the government and business circles. Some government officials have also broken the law by engaging in corruption and through dereliction of duty, which has led to the disintegration of public trust.
In 2002, the Taipei Society criticized the Chen administration for favoring big business, but the government was not willing to listen. Over the past six years, the DPP has been busy with the consolidation, expansion and distribution of power while ignoring criticism from the public, which led to a crushing defeats for the party.
Some law enforcement officials have no respect for ethics and are willing to become "deep throats" to those who specialize in exposing scandals. Law enforcement officials violating the principle of closed investigations have been seen in the Chao case -- and may be even more obvious in the case involving train derailment suspect Lee Tai-an (李泰安).
In view of this, we demand that police and prosecutors strictly abide by the "closed investigation" principle. We also call on politicians and the media not to misinteprete this principle or mislead the public as to its significance. By no means must they think of themselves as judges who decide who can be released on bail and who is guilty.
The opposition parties' overriding goal over the past six years has been to regain power. They lack democratic ideals, their performance in the legislature has been lethargic and they only engage in political infighting. People do not feel that the opposition sincerely cares for the development of the nation. This is damaging to the nation's democratic development.
A democratic society cannot be built on two diametrically opposed ideologies. I hope that the KMT and the People First Party will fulfill their duties as the opposition and build an image as benevolent political parties able to tell right from wrong that jointly seek to deepen the nation's democracy.
The media look only for political motives and not the truth, and with their rumor-mongering and defiant reporting they get involved in the political struggle, causing a great deal of confusion among the public. Worse than that, some media outlets are taking advantage of the political upheaval to fabricate news instead of reporting the truth, trampling on the privacy of citizens and violating human rights.
Here is a list of the Taipei Society's appeals:
First, the judiciary is the last line of defense for justice. It should not care whether or not the first family is involved in Chao's case, but only focus on making a thorough investigation without accepting restrictions dictated by politicians.
Second, government decisions and information should be made transparent to build public trust. Under the table dealings are often a cause of corruption.
Third, all political parties should consider the future of the nation, and understand that our democracy has been hard-won. They should avoid provoking confrontation, restore public trust and consolidate democracy.
Fourth, police, prosecutors and the media should act professionally and comply with professional ethics.
Fifth, the public should understand that it is a mistake to entrust the future of the nation to political parties and politicians. They should not hesitate to express their concerns and stop being manipulated by politicians.
The Taipei Society urges government and opposition to bring the political infighting to an end and wait patiently for the results of the investigation lest Taiwan's democracy be ruined overnight.
Hawang Shiow-duan is the chair of the Taipei Society and professor in the department of political science at Soochow University.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
Numerous expert analyses characterize today’s US presidential election as a risk for Taiwan, given that the two major candidates, US Vice President Kamala Harris and former US president Donald Trump, are perceived to possess divergent foreign policy perspectives. If Harris is elected, many presume that the US would maintain its existing relationship with Taiwan, as established through the American Institute in Taiwan, and would continue to sell Taiwan weapons and equipment to help it defend itself against China. Under the administration of US President Joe Biden, whose political views Harris shares, the US on Oct. 25 authorized arms transfers to Taiwan, another
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and