Chinese President Hu Jintao (
This statement shows that the long-term strategy of the US -- engaging China economically in the hope that it will transform itself politically -- has so far been an abject failure. China is basically giving the Bush administration the middle finger and saying "we will manufacture and sell you all the cheap consumer goods you want, but please don't lecture us on democracy and human rights."
This also reveals the inherently two-faced nature of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The CCP has schizophrenic tendencies. To the outside world it gives the appearance of a rational, calm entity; presenting China as a responsible "stakeholder" in the international community by leading efforts to broker a deal in the North Korean nuclear talks. Yet domestically it remains a brutal, heartless bully that slaps down any individual or group that presents even the slightest challenge to its hold on power.
For evidence of this one only has to look at the crackdown on Falun Gong, the heavy jail terms meted out to the founders of the China Democracy Party, the increasing number of Internet dissidents sent to prison and the violent way Beijing deals with protesting farmers.
The people of Taiwan are more aware of this than most because they occupy a unique position that enables them to view both sides of Beijing's split personality.
Taiwan is detached enough to see how China treats it in the international community. Sometimes it turns on the charm, as when it coordinated former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan's (連戰) visit to occur just before Hu's US trip, making it appear to the international community as if everything between Taiwan and China was fine, then handing out seemingly generous economic offers and talking of mutual prosperity and a peaceful resolution.
Yet Taiwan also sees how China continues to work ceaselessly behind the scenes to squeeze its international space, kick it out and keep it out of all international organizations -- even non-governmental ones -- and force the world to accept its "one China" policy.
And while it is easy for Hu to placate the international community and tell them everything is fine, it seems like he is having a much harder time convincing the millions of Chinese left behind by economic reform. Official statistics say there were 87,000 protests last year by various disgruntled groups, a gross underestimate at best.
There has also been a big increase in persecution, crackdowns and a general lack of tolerance for dissent over the last few years.
In their increasing desperation, Hu and the party leadership are coming up with new ideas as they seek to hang onto control.
According to a recent article in Newsweek, they have reintroduced the learning of Confucian values into schools. After suffering decades of vilification by the communist authorities and being castigated as personifying everything bad about "old China," the sage and his concepts of respect for authority have been rehabilitated by the leadership in a bid to pacify younger generations, counter radical thinking and nurture respect for the ruling party.
But Hu and his regime must be aware that respect has to be earned.
China may have won respect in the international arena, if it wants to be respected domestically and in Taiwan, then it has to start earning it.
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS